Tell that to any golf pro and see what he says.
Studys have shown in ML's it makes no difference. Has been discussed here numerous times, if it did line shooters would use dimpled round balls.
Tell that to any golf pro and see what he says.
Well, a few aren't really answers to the question.......59 answers to this question?
Good point. Were it positioned just right it would indeed get shaved. Depending on one’s mold the sprue could be just a slightly flat spot on the ball on an actual protuberance of lead. For example a .454 Lee mold leaves a noticeable slightly, very slightly, raised bump.
On a 457 round ball iron mold from Lyman I have to look closely for it.
59 answers to this question?
Well for my part I follow this forum as much for entertainment as for informational reasons. I got Google and Wikipedia for the dull stuff.Well, a few aren't really answers to the question.......
Well for my part I follow this forum as much for entertainment as for informational reasons. I got Google and Wikipedia for the dull stuff.
The off thread stuff makes for interesting reading. It’s a thing I like about this forum they ain’t so quick to shut down a thread.
JMO.
I vaguely remember the article, and is one of the reasons I do not worry about the sprue.Muzzle Blasts magazine did had a article about this about 15 years ago. The also addressed question of holes or voids in home cast round ball having an effect on accuracy. The author drilled holes of various depths into several ball then loaded and fired at a target then compared results. Their conclusion after several dozen shots was that sprue up down or sideways ultimately made no difference unless patch was damaged. Yhey also loaded the balls with drilled holes, some hole up, some hole down, the rest ball to side at various angles between up and down.
Virtually all hit to same point as aimed at. Their conclusions were that location of hole made no difference. What they found was the ball while spinning in flight found its own balance around its center of mass was self stabilizing in round ball.
I remember reading that article too and pretty much agree with their findings. I also believe that it is much more critical to the consistency of accuracy in a smooth bore shooting round balls that the consistency of ball placement is more necessary.I vaguely remember the article, and is one of the reasons I do not worry about the sprue.
Yep. That was me and many other serious 'X' hunters.some psycho shooters would weigh , and group as to weight , freshly cast balls to maintain their consistency of loading and supposed accuracy.
From god's lips to my ear!"Next place a ball, with the sprue up, [author's emphasis] in the center of the patch..., "
"I have heard old riflemen, years ago, say that it mattered not whether the sprue surface of the ball is placed at the bottom or the top when loading the round ball rifle, but this is not reasonable, and does not agree with my experience and that of the majority of the experienced riflemen who shoot the muzzle-loading rifles. ..., Experienced experts agree that better accuracy with the round ball rifles will be secured by always loading the sprue surface of the ball at the top, [author's emphasis] or towards the muzzle."
Ned Roberts The Muzzle-Loading Cap Lock Rifle (1947)
LD
For those of you that don’t patch and shoot bare ball how do you tell the sprue is up or down when you drop it down the barrel? Or that it’s not sidewise by the time it sits on the powder? Thanks.
I sure would like to know where I could buy swaged balls in .715" and .690" diameter.There was a article a few years back in muzzle blasts, I believe bye the writers who went bye the name of the bevel brothers about this, I load sprue up if I run ball, if shooting factory ball I buy swaged balls. Really do not see where it makes all that much difference as long as you center the spru in the patch.
Enter your email address to join: