If they sell them to a pawn shop, you may get them back IF the police give a crap enough to check them.
I'm surprised you had all of the serial numbers. I'd better write mine down.
He probably didn't know what he was stealing. Hoods don't want cap & ball guns.
Thanks for the vote of confidence. :cursing:
Let me
school you a bit...
First, Zonie has a good chance of getting them back as the serial numbers are available, but those serial numbers might be removed. Zonie just has to be sure that they were entered as stolen "guns" and not reproductions, as stolen guns are never deleted from the national computer, but somebody might think a "reproduction" is some sort of non-firing copy or toy. If they are listed as stolen property the maximum time that they will be held in the computer is 2 years. So if I arrest some schmuck here just outside of DC, and he's got one of Zonie's guns..., I will know in a matter of minutes when I run the serial number.
"Hoods don't want cap & ball guns."
Really?
Bad guys don't care what it is as long as it looks like a handgun. They commit bank robberies with pellet guns. The average shop owner or mugging victim doesn't have enough gun knowledge to tell the difference.
Zonie, I find it very wierd that the suspect knew exactly where to enter your home, to avoid your wife, and to gain access to the handguns. The person has been inside your home in the past. The pellet rifle was taken for the suspect's use... look to a teenager as your culprit.
btech wrote
I hear people talk all the time about facing down an intruder with a gun. Unless you're active, trained military I wouldn't recommend it. If you've never actually shot another person before face to face you will hesitate they will not.
And your experience is what?
As a cop of 23 years, a detective of 17, and a former USMC Infantry/Recon Officer, I would highly recommend it. More intruders are chased away each year by citizens who merely produce a firearm than are apprehended by police (FACT). Bad guys do not want to run the risk of being shot.... this is why places where it's very tough to have any form of firearm in the home are rife with burglaries (Washington DC for example). While it's true you need to have it loaded, or be able to load it in a matter of seconds..., as an empty gun is a paper weight, and you need to be prepared to fire it at the intruder, but it's much more likely he will flee upon sight of the firearm.
Don't fall for the total and unadulterated BS that you hear such as "A person is much more likely to have a gun taken from them and used on them than to chase a criminal away."
:bull:
THAT is
anti-gun crapola without any study. They got that
crapola from looking at police officers who were disarmed and then shot by their own weapons... but ignored the fact that 95% of all officers disarmed of their weapons were incapacitated by another weapon first. Whether they were killed with their guns or with the suspect's weapon, it was going to happen anyway. They ignored the fact that most officers that fall to this situation advanced alone, without waiting for backup, into a situation they knew was dangerous, and were ambushed. How that applies to a home owner or civilian is beyond all reason.
In closing, Zonie, you need to beef up your house hardware, mostly for your wife's peace of mind, but it's pretty rare that a bad guy will come back, as they assume you'll be ready for them next time. Further, the guy probably knows he didn't get all the guns, and has no idea if you have others unknown to him or elsewhere in the house. After all, he could have entered and produced a weapon, tied up the wife, and then helped himself...., but he didn't which means he probably didn't want to run the risk of encountering a a person with a loaded gun, and/or didn't want to be identified, as again... I think he's been in the house before.
LD