I almost never pick up single caps. I always use a capper.
T/C 12g New Englander max safe loads
- Thread starter NorthFork
- Start date
Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:
I almost never pick up single caps. I always use a capper.
Could you post a link to the manual? I've been looking for one myself with no success.
I just bought a 12 gauge New Englander and I'm also looking for manuals. Any chance you can post the link where you found yours?
Elgatodeacero
36 Cl.
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2020
- Messages
- 66
- Reaction score
- 80
If you email Smith and Wesson they will send you a pdf version or a link for the Thompson Center New Englander factory manual with load data.
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2005
- Messages
- 7,093
- Reaction score
- 5,385
From what I've seen over the years, most MODERN-manufacture m/l shotguns are proofed at 700 Kg per sq.cm or 10,000 psi.
Actually there is NO real standard.
The proofing houses around the world simply set an in-house standard, and upon passing of that proofing test, the house bestows its black powder proofing mark. I know the Italians have a very different standard than the UK or Germany.
It's not standardized as with modern powder cartridges.
LD
Wow am I a wussy. My loads dont come close to approaching what some here are putting in their shotguns. I'm using 63 grains of FFg under 7/8 ounces of shot and that breaks clays easily out to 25 yards. Come hunting season I'll be going up to 68 grains under 1 oz of shot, only because I'll be dropping down to #7 shot and want to keep my patterns dense enough. Now my gun is only 5.5 pounds which will make a difference in felt recoil.
Nothing wrong with that, I was using 10z loads in my 10g the other week. Worked fine.
megasupermagnum
45 Cal.
Ok, I have to know. What compels you to load 63 and 68 grains? Why would you not load 60 and 65 grains?
To each there own is what I say. Whatever works for you is your business. I will say this though, Britsmoothy is the main reason I switched to using 3Fg in my 20 gauges. I was very impressed with the patterns and the increased velocity which is an added plus for waterfowling 
Simple, the little measuring device I have has different stops. That is what the powder weighed at each of those stops. Using the same stops to measure shot so I have square loads.
Yes, powder grain size has nothing to do with pattern. Wad choice does though with black powder.To each there own is what I say. Whatever works for you is your business. I will say this though, Britsmoothy is the main reason I switched to using 3Fg in my 20 gauges. I was very impressed with the patterns and the increased velocity which is an added plus for waterfowling
Powder grain choice does indeed effect velocity and lethality in my experience.
Building a load around a particular wad column limits the developer more than they may realise, reducing most to use what they perceived is the less fierce powder choices.
Finally they see an improvement in their patterns and wrongly deduce finer grades are inheritly bad for shotguns.
All my shotguns use nothing associated with the loading of a modern cartridge except a roll crimp over shot card.
I was not aware there was a mid-run change on the breech. It certainly wouldn't hurt to epoxy bed the tang/breech socket. In fact, when I added the rifle barrel to mine (early kit version) I had to "adjust" the breech and I ended up waxing the hooked breech/barrel and tang and bedding them in epoxy. As you say - there is little period authentic about the New Englander lock mechanism and architecture. Done properly it won't show when assembled.
They're fun little hunting guns. Do what adds to your enjoyment. I added tacks to mine (especially along the fore-end) so when hunting with wool mittens or half-mittens it's easier to grip
