Skipped over the rifling? Really?
Yeah, been reading this same thing for years on the net. Cannot see any evidence for such a thing happening. That said, I even arrived at that conclusion myself in my first year of shooting my TC Hawken back in about 75.
It never did shoot the round ball very accurately. I am hoping to try something new that will give me better accuracy when I go elk hunting in September.
I had that identical rifle which I gave away to a son in law who later divorced out of the family. I sure miss that gun, but not the son in law. :haha:
I won some matches with that rifle but it did take some fiddling to get it to shoot. I finally ended up with a .530 ball, 80 grains of goex ff and a patch thick enough to be quite hard to start. That same load killed a nice bull elk, so there is no doubt about it's efficacy in the field. You need a patch that is not only thick enough, but it needs to be
tough!
Some things that you will hear about your rifle is that the rifling is too shallow or that the 1:48 twist won't shoot a ball. Just practice ignoring those bits of "wisdom".
I would suggest that you take your rifle to the range with three or four potential patch materials of varying thickness. Also take along some .530 and .535 balls. Use a grease type lube of your choice.
wipe after every shot, and test fire at least three of those different patches each with both of the ball sizes over about 100 grains of powder.
Don't bother checking your targets or groups. You don't even need to aim at anything! After each three shots, pick up the patches and "read" them. Look for the ball and patch combo that does the least damage to the patch. Find the combo that does not cut your patch. Your using a heavy powder charge to stress the patch to the max. You can always choose your hunting load later.
Not saying not to use a conical, just saying don't give up. That ball will do a fine job of killing your elk and without the recoil that a .54 conical will plant on you. :shocked2: