Found this on Pinterest from The Firearms Blog. Wouldn't be that hard for a machinist to reproduce.
-
Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.
We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.
Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103
This simple idea was and still is genius.
- Thread starter The Miner '49er
- Start date
Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:
is that not an inline?? AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH 
Well, now, after some digging I see that 3 years ago Colonial Boy posted about this gun. There was some discussion so apparently it didn't violate any rules at that time. Maybe the rules changed since his post. Don't know, sorry if it was a faux pas. FWIW I still applaud the inventor.
Hard to argue with the rugged simplicity of that design. Might take a bit to get used to the "aesthetics" of it.
The trigger guard acting as the mainspring is problematic if it gets damaged.
Yes, but an early one using caps, not a modern one.is that not an inline?? AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH
Didn't even *the ones we're not discussing* use caps at one point? I remember most of them having No. 11 nipples. 209 was a big thing ~20 years ago.
Moses was using all of his brain. Too cool!
A buddy of mine in NM built one that looks very similar. I don't think he had seen anything like it before, just thought it would be fun and had a big chunk of brass and a milling machine. With a Unertl on top it was a very effective rifle out to 600M or more.
Love it!
FWIW, less not being truly ‘inline’, under hammers also make use of the trigger guard being the main spring.
FWIW, less not being truly ‘inline’, under hammers also make use of the trigger guard being the main spring.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2020
- Messages
- 3,110
- Reaction score
- 7,024
Very practical design in my book, strange looking to my eyes but practical.
If I had one, I’d name it, “Skeletor”…
Phil Coffins
69 Cal.
You don’t have to be a machinist to build one like it. Saw, file, and drill would be enough but a forge and hammer would make it even easier to build.
Considering what I shoot (see my photo) this is an interesting firearm.
Please post a link to that discussion.
Do a search for Babcock open frame rifle.
I suppose that may have been the first inline
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
- Messages
- 3,272
- Reaction score
- 6,632
Working on one and posted a couple of pics however we’re way off topic so I deleted them,
Last edited:
@Colonial Boy That's fantastic! Looks you're off to a good start. I'll PM you with a bit info that might be of some help, at least for ideas. Can't wait to see your finished product. Good luck!
smoothshooter
50 Cal.
The simplicity and efficiency of design of the action is pure genius!
