• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

To carve or not

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
1,275
Reaction score
647
Location
Tall Grass Prairie
I've read here very fancy wood ought to be allowed to speak for itself and left undecorated with carving. Plainer wood is better dressed up with carving. The grain in fancy wood is harder to carve precisely than the more forgiving plainer wood, which can be carved more easily. I've received a precarved stock with very fancy striping and a lot of birdseye figure. I paid a premium over and above the maker's highest price for striped maple for the stock. What should I be thinking about when deciding to carve or not to carve?

I'm putting the stock back in its box and putting it aside until I'm caught up on my projects. It's just satisfying to plan ahead.

No, I won't be posting pictures now. I'll wait until the project is ready to go. Just imagine a stock so nice it'll make you envious and you'll have a picture in your mind.
 
If you hunt, that deer ain't gonna know whether it's been shot with a plain or fancy stock.

If it pleases you then carve away. If you're doing it to please someone else, I'd sit back and think it over first.

None of my guns have carvings. 1. I doubt I could pull it off. 2. I simply have no desire to do so. I don't need to brag how good a gunsmith I am.
 
I've read here very fancy wood ought to be allowed to speak for itself and left undecorated with carving. Plainer wood is better dressed up with carving. The grain in fancy wood is harder to carve precisely than the more forgiving plainer wood, which can be carved more easily. I've received a precarved stock with very fancy striping and a lot of birdseye figure. I paid a premium over and above the maker's highest price for striped maple for the stock. What should I be thinking about when deciding to carve or not to carve?

I'm putting the stock back in its box and putting it aside until I'm caught up on my projects. It's just satisfying to plan ahead.

No, I won't be posting pictures now. I'll wait until the project is ready to go. Just imagine a stock so nice it'll make you envious and you'll have a picture in your mind.
The cons you mentioned about figured wood is what I believe too. I even bought the Woodsrunner practice stock from Kibler to experiment on. Haven’t touched it yet, but I will. However, the kit I ordered is extra fancy maple, so whatever I ultimately do will be simple and minimal.
 
I’m definitely nervous about stock carving. And it’s funny because I’ve done wood carvings for years, but doing whimsical wood spirits doesn’t require the precision that stock carving does.
 

Attachments

  • 975726B0-6E25-45FC-8B9D-FD3D209C33FF.jpeg
    975726B0-6E25-45FC-8B9D-FD3D209C33FF.jpeg
    3.1 MB
I’m definitely nervous about stock carving. And it’s funny because I’ve done wood carvings for years, but doing whimsical wood spirits doesn’t require the precision that stock carving does.
Wow that’s very impressive work!
 
To answer the OPs question we must ask what type of rifle, era, school, etc? Rococo carving would look silly on a plains rifle, just as aLancaster school rifle would look somewhat odd without some carving.
when all is said, it depends on the builder, your rifle, your choice. But also remember that many of the gunsmiths built sturdy rifles, but learned their craft on the job. We admire the fanciest and nicest rifles, but look closely and even the great examples have errors. Add to that the scabs of usage, and the rifle is slightly less than perfect.
I encourage those with a penchant for Golden Age flintlocks to take the leap. If you are asking this question, you probably aren’t making this for a customer, but for yourself. Make it yours.
 
My last two builds had CM4+ grade wood. I only did very minor incise and relief around the barrel tang and lock panels. The figure is the decoration and yes, carving around the multitudinous grain directions can be extra challenging and somewhat chippy at times. I prefer simpler, more subdued rifles in general. View attachment 216467


View attachment 216464View attachment 216465View attachment 216466
That is really nice. I like the straight lines a lot. I’m funny. I’m not crazy about a lot of carving especially on a stock like that. But I really like engraving on the metal. 🤷‍♂️
 
only one way to tell. get the stock made. then draw all the carving that you want to do on it. take a few steps back and ask yourself does it look better or not. simple carving can add to a rifle even with highly figured wood.
 
Back
Top