I have seen other threads on this forum about choices of Flintlock Rifles. I am really torn between a conventional American Longrifle or a military style rifle like that of the Harpers Ferry and the Baker/Jaeger. Like the most recent post on this forum I also hunt in Maryland and will be hunting Whitetail Deer (good coincidence). If anyone can tell me the pros and cons between the two styles to aid in my decision or personal recommendations that would be amazing.
Welcome Neighbor!
So you haven't mentioned you're going to build, you're going to have it built, or you're going to buy such factory made. Starting from the lowest cost, and the style...
The Baker, and The Jaeger, and the Harper's Ferry 1803 are all short rifles. They are then considered by some as being handy in thick brush, but I've found that the brush needs to be really really thick for that to be the case.
The Jaeger by Pedersoli and the Harper's Ferry by Euroarms are both .54 caliber. The Jaeger has a faster twist, and it has been shown to be accurate in both round ball and conical bullets.
The Baker would be retro-fitting an India made copy with a Colerain barrel. That's a bit of a pain in the arse. It's a .62 caliber barrel, and is going to hammer deer compared to a .54, but unless you must have a Baker, I'd shy away from the Baker retro fitted.
Next you have parts kits from some of the suppliers, which will take time to build, and if you're not well versed in assembly, you have something less than you had hoped.
There are other factory made rifles, the Lyman Trade Rifle, and Pedersoli Frontier, that might suit you. So too the Great Plains Rifle from Lyman is very good, but not a long rifle nor military. The Lyman Trade Rifle is short, and very inexpensive, and known to work well with round ball. The Pedersoli Frontier is a long rifle, but at the bottom end of long rifle lengths with a 39" barrel. The .54 caliber version is a slow twist barrel for good size powder charges with that .54 patched round ball.
Topping the list is having a rifle made for you.
I've already discussed the pros of the short rifles, and the pros will remain if you have a rifle built.
It's been my observation that a hunter, especially hunting in Western Maryland, moves so slowly when hunting right with a flintlock (IF you move at all, eh?) that a 42 swamped barrel, or even a 44 inch or 46 inch barrel are not a problem. The longer barrel should give you a longer sighting plane than a 24" Jaeger or 30" Baker, making it easier for your human eyes to align the sights and make an excellent shot. I have found the longer barrel on my swamped 38" Colerain barrel is easier to steady than the barrel on a 24" jaeger, and a 42" barrel might be even steadier. It's up to you.
Depending on how much coin you have and what you're willing to do, I'd personally opt for getting Mr. Kibler to finish a .54 caliber 42" swamped barrel long rifle
in-the-white..., meaning the construction is done but I'd have to do the wood finishing and some metal polishing. Then I'd complete the rifle, and so save some money but have a very nice rifle indeed.
LD
In Damascus, MD