• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

tung oil

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
this is where I get mine.
[url] http://www.realmilkpaint.com/oil.html[/url]

Jon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thx, book marked for next order.

I would say that site lays out the best description of, and the superior qualities of tung oil I have read to date.
 
I've had great success with Behr 600 Scandinavian Tung Oil Finish. It contains both BLO and Tung Oil. I've also used Formbys but it's not really an oil finish but a varnish (as mentioned) and added coats don't do anything.
 
I originally intended to finish the longrifle that I'm building with boiled linseed oil, but mixed Formby's Tung Oil Finish 50:50 with artist grade linseed oil to use as a sealer. It seems to be soaking in well and sealing the pores, yet drys in just a few hours. It appears to me to be the best of both worlds. It's looking really nice so far. I might just go ahead and keep using the Tung Oil Finish mixed with linseed oil as a finish. Has anyone done this before? How did it turn out?
 
I've finished a bunch of weapons using 1/3 each linseed oil, Satin Tung Oil Finish, and turpentine. It worked great.
 
Why shouldn't varnish be used, since it is what most original weapons were finished with? It builds up just like linseed oil for me.
 
swampman
I think the confusion comes from the fact that "varnish" is a somewhat generic term. There are several types of varnishs. As I understand it boiled linseed oil with different resins or dryers added becomes an oil varnish. I'm sure Mike Brooks knows far more than I do and can add a lot more insight.

Regards, Dave
 
Swampman said:
Why shouldn't varnish be used, since it is what most original weapons were finished with? It builds up just like linseed oil for me.

I didn't say it shouldn't be used. I just said added coats don't do anything. A varnish seals the wood and added coats just go on top of the varnish and not into the wood like a true oil finish does.
 
Varnish was used differently back then. Varnish was an action not a product from what I understand. You could "varnish" a stock using all kinds of stuff. I don't think tung oil was around then. I think that it comes from a tung plant or tree and was used in Asia mostly. It didn't come around until around 1900's.
 
Varnish was a product, and an action. I suspect Tung oil has been around for hundreds of years, since their culture is much older than ours. It is not an historically correct finish for 18th c. colonial guns. I only know one builder that uses historically correct finishes. They are too much trouble for most commerical builders.
 
Back
Top