We have a very warm day here Missouri, so I decided to bust off a few caps. Was curious about "power" (hate that word to describe performance) and penetration on boards of my 1849 Pocket vs. another handgun. I am not mentioning the other handgun, and this thread is about the relative "power" of a particular cap and ball revolver.
My target was a 2x6 Douglas fir, and a 2x12 treated "Yellowood", both of recent vintage. I loaded the 1849 with cast round balls made of pure lead, and dropping from the mold at .330. I used18 grain charges (max and still able to load) of Pyro P, Swiss 3F, and 777 3F. None of the balls propelled by Pyro P or Swiss 3F fully penetrate the boards. A few almost did in the Douglas fir, bulging wood out the back side. The 777 was more powerful, a few balls barely made it thru on both boards, still stuck but visible. For comparison only, the other gun not mentioned zipped right thru both types of lumber with standard HV solids, but hp's failed to penetrate. Got an Era's Gone .31 bullet mold on the way, I expect more "power" and penetration with that projectile.
My target was a 2x6 Douglas fir, and a 2x12 treated "Yellowood", both of recent vintage. I loaded the 1849 with cast round balls made of pure lead, and dropping from the mold at .330. I used18 grain charges (max and still able to load) of Pyro P, Swiss 3F, and 777 3F. None of the balls propelled by Pyro P or Swiss 3F fully penetrate the boards. A few almost did in the Douglas fir, bulging wood out the back side. The 777 was more powerful, a few balls barely made it thru on both boards, still stuck but visible. For comparison only, the other gun not mentioned zipped right thru both types of lumber with standard HV solids, but hp's failed to penetrate. Got an Era's Gone .31 bullet mold on the way, I expect more "power" and penetration with that projectile.