shortstring
40 Cal.
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2006
- Messages
- 357
- Reaction score
- 2
It's not out of the question that the builder in the 60s used an antique lock. As I understand it they didn't have the options that we have now as far as parts.
DelSnavely said:Well with the research I've done on the lock, it looks more like someone built a rifle around a W.M. Large barrel and an original Michael M. Maslin lock.
This is a pic of the markings on the lock itself. I've been told by a gun maker that even though these locks were reproduced by Russ Hamm, CVA and others, NONE of them reproduced the lettering on the outside of the lock like this. If that's the case then, this lock was produced by Michael M. Maslin himself between 1822-1847.
You tell me.
This rifle is getting better all the time!
DelSnavely said:Ok, so now I'm even MORE confused...lol
If RonT has one Dated 1972, when did he STOP dating the barrels?
This is beginning to look like a useless endevor, when all of the information conflicts.
Russ T Frizzen said:My Russ Hamm flint lock has no marking on the exterior--just his name inside. The rifle it's on is dated 1973.
RonT said:In this case it appears that the 1972 was stamped by Bill Large as the barrel had not been mounted prior to my obtaining. Breeched, yes, signature on top flat, mounted, no.
As to alleged runout relative to the stamp....hafta' prove that to me by stats. This one doesn't show me that.
The "~3" high" is a sight problem (maybe, using Don's mini's)and of no concern to me at this point.
At a recent roundball match, offhand at ~35 yds., it was dead on...it was...I wasn't.. :haha:
This "just the facts, Mam" documantation is good for the sport and a great discussion point, maybe more variations will fall out....
R
Don, trying to send you a PM.
Enter your email address to join: