David --
My thought on target guns -- with which you are free to disagree -- is that they're still guns, no matter how specifically designed for punching holes in paper. The purpose of target shooting, in the beginning, was to hone one's skill as a shooter for those times that personal need or government decree made the ability to shoot well a matter of life or death. However far from that origin our guns and intentions may be, I still feel that we're talking about weapons. I also, however, agree with the several posters who have suggested that we agree to disagree, because this is an unwinnable argument. Too many differing points of view that assign differing degrees of priority to intent and the specific use of a specific gun at a specific moment.
My thought on target guns -- with which you are free to disagree -- is that they're still guns, no matter how specifically designed for punching holes in paper. The purpose of target shooting, in the beginning, was to hone one's skill as a shooter for those times that personal need or government decree made the ability to shoot well a matter of life or death. However far from that origin our guns and intentions may be, I still feel that we're talking about weapons. I also, however, agree with the several posters who have suggested that we agree to disagree, because this is an unwinnable argument. Too many differing points of view that assign differing degrees of priority to intent and the specific use of a specific gun at a specific moment.