• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

What is your favorite BP substitute?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Pete D. said:
Yeah, much as I am a fan of the holy black, it is irritating when folk don't answer the posted question.
My "favorite", when I was using Subs, was Pyrodex. I still have some pounds of it sitting on the shelf.
Pete
Agreed. Pyrodex is not the holy black, a truth which was more apparent using the howdah as opposed to a revolver. Using a ramrod vs. a loading lever brings the fouling of pyrodex to light. It is dirtier, but it most definitely works (with caplocks or cartridges). As I mentioned before, I haven't tried other subs due to concerns about shelf life, along with a few others. If you can't get goex or swiss, and you're not using a flinter, buy the pyro and don't lose any sleep. The pyrodex I still keep around is stored in my humidity-controlled safe, and has not lost any of its potency over many years-I think humidity control is the key to long shelf life with pyrodex, and it's not a bad idea with BP either.
 
Pyrodex P (Only Sub I have tried)worked fine for me in my pistols and rifles then I bought 25lb of Goex FFFG and havent used any Pyrodex since..
 
flintlock62 said:
Carl Davis said:
Why is it when someone asks what your favorite sub is, the first answer is "buy black powder" and the second answer is "I don't use subs"?

Shouldn't only people who actually use subs be answering?

Why must everything here turn into a heated debate? :shake:

Some of us HAVE used subs and simply do not like it, that's why we say use real black. Try Swiss, you'll love it, ,,,
Here's my point -

The guy's question is: "I'm going to cook some beef, what is your favorite recipe?"

Your answer is, "Beef is bad for you, you should cook some fish".

His reply to you should be: "Please pay attention, I'M GOING TO COOK SOME BEEF!" :haha:
 
One thing that bothers me is the first rule of this forum and I quote ( The main focus of this site is "Traditional Muzzleloading"; The history of the people, the muzzleloading weapons and battles, up to and including the American Civil War. (From the inception of firearms through 1865) How traditional is any sub powder made in 1975 and talk of stainless steel and my inline this and my inline that Maybe we should not discuss Sub powders at all???
 
Carl Davis said:
flintlock62 said:
Carl Davis said:
Why is it when someone asks what your favorite sub is, the first answer is "buy black powder" and the second answer is "I don't use subs"?

Shouldn't only people who actually use subs be answering?

Why must everything here turn into a heated debate? :shake:

Some of us HAVE used subs and simply do not like it, that's why we say use real black. Try Swiss, you'll love it, ,,,
Here's my point -

The guy's question is: "I'm going to cook some beef, what is your favorite recipe?"

Your answer is, "Beef is bad for you, you should cook some fish".

His reply to you should be: "Please pay attention, I'M GOING TO COOK SOME BEEF!" :haha:

Here's mt point. We both believe in the 1st ammendment, right? We both have the right to voice our own opinions, right? I have merely given my own OPINION. If you do not like it, it does not bother me. I have used pyrodex, do not like it, find that when ordering BP in bulk, the price is cheaper, and I get better accuracy from it. I am not trying to force BP on you or anyone else. If you want to use subs, OK then, do it! Just giving my own OPINION! :surrender:
 
flintlock62 said:
Carl Davis said:
flintlock62 said:
Carl Davis said:
Why is it when someone asks what your favorite sub is, the first answer is "buy black powder" and the second answer is "I don't use subs"?

Shouldn't only people who actually use subs be answering?

Why must everything here turn into a heated debate? :shake:

Some of us HAVE used subs and simply do not like it, that's why we say use real black. Try Swiss, you'll love it, ,,,
Here's my point -

The guy's question is: "I'm going to cook some beef, what is your favorite recipe?"

Your answer is, "Beef is bad for you, you should cook some fish".

His reply to you should be: "Please pay attention, I'M GOING TO COOK SOME BEEF!" :haha:

Here's mt point. We both believe in the 1st ammendment, right? We both have the right to voice our own opinions, right? I have merely given my own OPINION. If you do not like it, it does not bother me. I have used pyrodex, do not like it, find that when ordering BP in bulk, the price is cheaper, and I get better accuracy from it. I am not trying to force BP on you or anyone else. If you want to use subs, OK then, do it! Just giving my own OPINION! :surrender:
Having an opinion is great. Forcing it on people when they specifically didn't ask for it is something completely different. Your right to "free speech" (which you don't have on a private forum), has nothing to do with not addressing the question that was asked.
 
Carl Davis said:
flintlock62 said:
Carl Davis said:
flintlock62 said:
Carl Davis said:
Why is it when someone asks what your favorite sub is, the first answer is "buy black powder" and the second answer is "I don't use subs"?

Shouldn't only people who actually use subs be answering?

Why must everything here turn into a heated debate? :shake:

Some of us HAVE used subs and simply do not like it, that's why we say use real black. Try Swiss, you'll love it, ,,,
Here's my point -

The guy's question is: "I'm going to cook some beef, what is your favorite recipe?"

Your answer is, "Beef is bad for you, you should cook some fish".

His reply to you should be: "Please pay attention, I'M GOING TO COOK SOME BEEF!" :haha:

Here's mt point. We both believe in the 1st ammendment, right? We both have the right to voice our own opinions, right? I have merely given my own OPINION. If you do not like it, it does not bother me. I have used pyrodex, do not like it, find that when ordering BP in bulk, the price is cheaper, and I get better accuracy from it. I am not trying to force BP on you or anyone else. If you want to use subs, OK then, do it! Just giving my own OPINION! :surrender:
Having an opinion is great. Forcing it on people when they specifically didn't ask for it is something completely different. Your right to "free speech" (which you don't have on a private forum), has nothing to do with not addressing the question that was asked.

Wow! I forgot this was a communist block China site! :surrender: :bow: :redface:
 
jaw69 said:
One thing that bothers me is the first rule of this forum and I quote ( The main focus of this site is "Traditional Muzzleloading"; The history of the people, the muzzleloading weapons and battles, up to and including the American Civil War. (From the inception of firearms through 1865) How traditional is any sub powder made in 1975 and talk of stainless steel and my inline this and my inline that Maybe we should not discuss Sub powders at all???

You know another thing that has apparently gotton lost from "tradition" is "manners" and I am questioning intelligence. A SPECIFIC question was asked (as has been pointed out) and some (that would be YOU) feel the need to go :eek:ff in a negative way and then try to erroneously defend the indefensible.
See another "rule" of this (or ANY forum) is that YOU are under NO obligation to reply at ALL! When you are apparently unable to awnser (and may be unable to inderstand) the question "What is your FAVORITE sub?" Then the best option for you is to keep silent.
 
flintlock62 said:
I have used pyrodex, do not like it, find that when ordering BP in bulk, the price is cheaper, and I get better accuracy from it. I am not trying to force BP on you or anyone else.
As I read this, Carl's point is, the original question was - "What is your favorite BP substitute?" The question wasn't "Is BP better than the subs". :v

I do like Carl's analogy though. Kind of like asking about BBQ and all the vegetarians chime with "DON'T EAT MEAT!". :wink:
 
I think that BP subs are a "gray area" here on the MLF in terms of being "traditional".

This topic has been teetering on being locked by the mods... so please just keep on topic... and disagree in a respectful, gentlemanly manner.

Now, let's get back to answering the original question.
 
Wattsy said:
jaw69 said:
One thing that bothers me is the first rule of this forum and I quote ( The main focus of this site is "Traditional Muzzleloading"; The history of the people, the muzzleloading weapons and battles, up to and including the American Civil War. (From the inception of firearms through 1865) How traditional is any sub powder made in 1975 and talk of stainless steel and my inline this and my inline that Maybe we should not discuss Sub powders at all???

You know another thing that has apparently gotton lost from "tradition" is "manners" and I am questioning intelligence. A SPECIFIC question was asked (as has been pointed out) and some (that would be YOU) feel the need to go :eek:ff in a negative way and then try to erroneously defend the indefensible.
See another "rule" of this (or ANY forum) is that YOU are under NO obligation to reply at ALL! When you are apparently unable to awnser (and may be unable to inderstand) the question "What is your FAVORITE sub?" Then the best option for you is to keep silent.
That's the point. If someone were to ask, "what is your favorite flintlock", why would people butt in with, "flintlocks are no good, get percussion". Yes, it's an "opinion", but there are times when you need to keep your opinion to yourself.

Bowing to the moderators wishes, I'm done with this. I apologize for taking it even further off topic.
 
Der Musiker said:
I think that BP subs are a "gray area" here on the MLF in terms of being "traditional".

This topic has been teetering on being locked by the mods... so please just keep on topic... and disagree in a respectful, gentlemanly manner.

Now, let's get back to answering the original question.

I agree and will not post again to this tread as it is getting way too touchy! :thumbsup:
 
Carl Davis said:
flintlock62 said:
Carl Davis said:
Why is it when someone asks what your favorite sub is, the first answer is "buy black powder" and the second answer is "I don't use subs"?

Shouldn't only people who actually use subs be answering?

Why must everything here turn into a heated debate? :shake:

Some of us HAVE used subs and simply do not like it, that's why we say use real black. Try Swiss, you'll love it, ,,,
Here's my point -

The guy's question is: "I'm going to cook some beef, what is your favorite recipe?"

Your answer is, "Beef is bad for you, you should cook some fish".

His reply to you should be: "Please pay attention, I'M GOING TO COOK SOME BEEF!" :haha:

Just trying to save people some grief. But what do
I know?
At one time part of my duties was inspecting guns with corrosion damaged bores. You can draw your own conclusion as to what damaged them.
Its America, people can do ANYTHING they want. I just feel people should at least be INFORMED as to the possible consequences.

If someone uses Pyrodex and many people do, they must follow some rules.

1. NEVER put ANYTHING in the bore that is liquid unless the fouling is to be immediately removed. This is direct from a Hodgdon response to Rifle or Handloader Magazine letter to editor (now many)years ago.

2. Unlike BP which cleans easily with cold water hot water may be needed. Lots of it. You cannot simply wipe the bore clean and think its good. It needs a thorough "washing". The salts are often harder to remove than BP fouing. In previously pitted bores such as vintage guns it becomes very much more difficult to prevent after rust.

3. Clean the gun COMPLETELY as soon as shooting is over. At the range so bring your own water bucket.

4. Simply using a water based patch lube while shooting can cause cumulative corrosion as can wet patching between shots (see #1).

5. There need not be red rust to have suffered damage. The active ingredients can eat the steel at the molecular level with no significant rust.


Yes I have used Pyrodex in testing with "company" guns. I have also seen the results of using Pyrodex and then simply wiping the bore clean as with BP or wet patching between relays in BPCR silhouette.

A great deal of the problem with Pyrodex early on was that some people writing about it or selling it called it non-corrosive. This was *not* Hodgdon's doing so far as I know. But it still damaged a lot of guns some beyond repair due to lack of or improper cleaning.

MY primary CONCERN with the various substitutes is that they erode BP sales. This reduces demand and squeezes the supply down farther and farther so that now I can by Pyrodex within 5 minute walk of my house in small town MT but cannot buy BP within 80 miles.
While BP in reality is no more dangerous and in fact is probably less so than modern propellents, the feds use a definition to impose unjustified, draconian rules on BP dealers. So the supply dries up. People then buy more subs. The process is like a Gov't inflicted cancer eating our sport.

Dan
 
I said that I would not post this topic again, but I lied. Thank you, Dan! :hatsoff: :wink:
 
flintlock62 said:
I said that I would not post this topic again, but I lied. Thank you, Dan! :hatsoff: :wink:

Hmmm... :hmm: I don't see anything in the forum rules re: lying, so I guess it's okay! :haha:

Here's a couple of articles pertaining to BP & substitutes y'all may find interesting...

What's The Difference...

Blackpowder to Pyrodex...

Just ignore any references in the articles to "inxxxxs". :wink:

Personally, I haven't used BP substitutes, so I have nothing else to contribute to this topic.
 
jaw69 said:
One thing that bothers me is the first rule of this forum and I quote ( The main focus of this site is "Traditional Muzzleloading"; The history of the people, the muzzleloading weapons and battles, up to and including the American Civil War. (From the inception of firearms through 1865) How traditional is any sub powder made in 1975 and talk of stainless steel and my inline this and my inline that Maybe we should not discuss Sub powders at all???

Due to the fact that some of the members, for whatever reason, simply can't get the real thing, substitute powders are viewed as a necessary evil and are acceptable topics of discussion on the Forum. Same thing goes for barrels. It's hard to find a handmade iron barrel these days. While stainless steel is not traditional, it is available on some sidelock muzzleloaders that are functionally identical to traditional muzzleloaders made from traditional materials. We would rather not exclude people from discussion as long as they are polite (mostly :surrender: :shake: ).
Discussion of modern inline muzzleloaders is not allowed here. Some members do sneak some in there sideways.
As long as it stays civil and respectful we try to err on the side of leniency. Believe it or not, us moderators don't really like deleting/editing posts. :wink:
 
The problem that has surfaced in this thread is not limited to this thread nor to this forum.
The question "what is your favorite BP substitute?" can be answered directly by typing in a brand name - like "Pyrodex" or "Triple Seven".
In a sense, anything else is gratuitous (my own earlier post is an example of this. I did answer the question but the other info was unnecessary.)
Quite a few of the posts in this thread never do answer the question at all. They do proselytize, however. That can get old fast; though the intention may be good, for someone seeking information, the off topics are distracting at best.
Pete
 
Pete D. said:
The problem that has surfaced in this thread is not limited to this thread nor to this forum.
The question "what is your favorite BP substitute?" can be answered directly by typing in a brand name - like "Pyrodex" or "Triple Seven".
In a sense, anything else is gratuitous (my own earlier post is an example of this. I did answer the question but the other info was unnecessary.)
Quite a few of the posts in this thread never do answer the question at all. They do proselytize, however. That can get old fast; though the intention may be good, for someone seeking information, the off topics are distracting at best.
Pete


Amen Brother! :hatsoff:
 
Back
Top