Grandpa Ron
45 Cal.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2011
- Messages
- 571
- Reaction score
- 10
Back in the late 60’s and early 70’s when my muzzleloading buddies and I were the starting out, we all cast our own lead rifle balls. In those days the cheapest source for lead was wheel weights. They were free for the asking. :grin: We cast and shot thousands of them. Eventually were told that wheel weight would not work in muzzleloaders because they contain tin and antimony and were too hard.
It seems the hard wheel weights would not grip the patch properly, they would not upset (swell) into the rifling when fired and they were too hard to load. So I purchased those high dollar lead balls that were sure to improve my accuracy and I when out of my way to get only pure lead for casting. Now I have balls that maybe loaded a smidgeon easier, were gripping the patch properly and I assume are upsetting properly when fired. However they have not improved my score, one wit.
About the mid 80’s Speer and Hornady swaged balls were readily available but why would I spend 10 cents a shot for my .54 cal. rifle when wheel weight were free? Well the answer was easy, the number of corner gas stations doing tire work was diminishing and the country as a whole was developing a paranoia about lead.
Recently I was given a new batch of wheel weight. so I figured “why not”. I cast about 50 of them and they are hard. I do not know the hardness but you can place a lead ball against a wheel weight ball and crush them in a vice. You will put a ¼ inch dimple in the lead and not even mark the wheel weight ball. The .526 cal. lead balls average 7 grains heavier. They both measure .526 when cast. There is a lot more tin in the dross when you flux the mixture. Since I am shooting a smoothie, I do not have to worry about gripping the rifling and patch so I will give them a try.
Still, I am wondering if anybody knows the lead content of modern made wheel weights or has the lead phobia reduce it to a minimum.
It seems the hard wheel weights would not grip the patch properly, they would not upset (swell) into the rifling when fired and they were too hard to load. So I purchased those high dollar lead balls that were sure to improve my accuracy and I when out of my way to get only pure lead for casting. Now I have balls that maybe loaded a smidgeon easier, were gripping the patch properly and I assume are upsetting properly when fired. However they have not improved my score, one wit.
About the mid 80’s Speer and Hornady swaged balls were readily available but why would I spend 10 cents a shot for my .54 cal. rifle when wheel weight were free? Well the answer was easy, the number of corner gas stations doing tire work was diminishing and the country as a whole was developing a paranoia about lead.
Recently I was given a new batch of wheel weight. so I figured “why not”. I cast about 50 of them and they are hard. I do not know the hardness but you can place a lead ball against a wheel weight ball and crush them in a vice. You will put a ¼ inch dimple in the lead and not even mark the wheel weight ball. The .526 cal. lead balls average 7 grains heavier. They both measure .526 when cast. There is a lot more tin in the dross when you flux the mixture. Since I am shooting a smoothie, I do not have to worry about gripping the rifling and patch so I will give them a try.
Still, I am wondering if anybody knows the lead content of modern made wheel weights or has the lead phobia reduce it to a minimum.