Shooting deer in a cornfield or beanfield is not hunting. Shooting deer over a salt lick, or at a water hole is not hunting, either. In fact, shooting a deer any place it naturally might want to be [emphasis added]-- or that you can induce it to THINK it wants to be -- is not "hunting." That's just shooting. Not sporting at all.
Now I am not starting a debate over hunting over "bait" which is where this quote was taken on another forum based mostly on center fire guns..., But...,
IF killing a deer "any place it naturally might want to be" is not hunting, then the logical conclusion is that this person requires a person to kill a deer where it "does not want to be". Now can anybody explain how you get a deer to go where it "naturally doesn't want to be" without using some artificial means?
Not to mention that hunting deer where you find a stand of oak trees so the deer come to feed on mast, or to a natural salt lick, or where you have crops planted, is a pattern that goes back to paleolithic times, but this clown says "that isn't hunting".
I'm just wondering what people think of this position? I hunt an area where the deer like to bed down, sometimes, and they move out to feed or to drink, and this guy also thinks that since I don't stalk the deer, I'm not a hunter either, though I don't use bait.
LD