rodwha
58 Cal.
The attitudes and comments of some have been pretty bad in comparison to the maybe dozen various forums (muzzleloading, backpacking, beer brewing, and cigars) that I'm a member of. By far this one takes the cake.
blackpowder62 said:the lyman handbook shows several 4f loads for revolvers from .31 cal, through 45 cal. i would look into that as a possibility in your revolvers if you are going to have alot of it.
Oh come on now. :shake:blackpowder62 said:Zonie said:Just the intro I was looking for.blackpowder62 said:you also might consider looking at the latest edition of the Lyman blackpowder handbook...
Although the first edition of the Lyman BLACK POWDER HANDBOOK & LOADING MANUAL had several listings for loads of 4F powder in pistols, the latest edition has eliminated all references to 4F powder loads from the pistol data.
I am surprised you didn't mention this when you referred to Lymans listings.
i didn't mention it, because why would they publish the same test from an earlier publication. if you noticed, the new edition has more and different information on other things. additional info on sabots and powders, ect. heck, if they included everything from the first it would be 2 inches thick.
Then is it fair to assume that you feel the fact Lyman didn't include the 4F pistol data in the later edition supports your position that it isn't safe?Zonie said:I suspect you didn't mention the fact that the 4Fg powder loads were deleted because it does not support your contention.
swathdiver said:***SNIP***
We know the ROA can take a chamber full of smokeless and survive according to Bill Ruger so that was a no brainer with using 4F in it.
***SNIP***
Enter your email address to join: