...thet's whut I yaammm! :grin:
Seriously, it's no hassle to get the stuff around here, it's cheaper than real BP and it's always treated me right. The question is; when is it safe to substitute Pyro P for RS in large bore (.50 & .54) rifles?
I know you have to reduce the charge, but how much? Can it be used at reduced charge rates behind conicals or is it strictly a roundball propostion? Will it deliver full power performance or will pressure get high before the velocity is delivered? I would think the faster burn rate would be an advantage in short-barreled carbines.
Monday I tried 75 gr. of P in my .54 Hawken (slow twist) shooting roundball. Normally I shoot 90 gr. RS with very good accuracy and little recoil. The P kicked significantly harder, the gun hit about 3" higher at 65 yds. and the grouping wasn't as good.
I once developed a very accurate load for my T/C Greyhawk using a 295 gr. Black Belt conical and 80 gr. of P. Talking to a T/C tech, I happened to mention it and was told not to use P with that load; only RS was approved. I figured at some level of reduction there would be an equivalence, but not according to the tech. Yet the Investarms manuals that came with my Cabela carbine and my GPR say the max load behind a .50 conical is either 80gr. of ffg or 60gr. of fffg...and makes no mention of Pyrodex, either RS or P.
P burns very clean in my .32 and .36, that's why I want to try it in the larger bores. That, and I hear you guys talking about using fffg for everything....shouldn't P work nearly as well?
Bob
Seriously, it's no hassle to get the stuff around here, it's cheaper than real BP and it's always treated me right. The question is; when is it safe to substitute Pyro P for RS in large bore (.50 & .54) rifles?
I know you have to reduce the charge, but how much? Can it be used at reduced charge rates behind conicals or is it strictly a roundball propostion? Will it deliver full power performance or will pressure get high before the velocity is delivered? I would think the faster burn rate would be an advantage in short-barreled carbines.
Monday I tried 75 gr. of P in my .54 Hawken (slow twist) shooting roundball. Normally I shoot 90 gr. RS with very good accuracy and little recoil. The P kicked significantly harder, the gun hit about 3" higher at 65 yds. and the grouping wasn't as good.
I once developed a very accurate load for my T/C Greyhawk using a 295 gr. Black Belt conical and 80 gr. of P. Talking to a T/C tech, I happened to mention it and was told not to use P with that load; only RS was approved. I figured at some level of reduction there would be an equivalence, but not according to the tech. Yet the Investarms manuals that came with my Cabela carbine and my GPR say the max load behind a .50 conical is either 80gr. of ffg or 60gr. of fffg...and makes no mention of Pyrodex, either RS or P.
P burns very clean in my .32 and .36, that's why I want to try it in the larger bores. That, and I hear you guys talking about using fffg for everything....shouldn't P work nearly as well?
Bob