well, i did some side-by-side comparison shooting this weekend with fffg blackpowder and pyrodex RS. i must say, i dont think ive ever noticed this before, and ive always thought that pyrodex was kind of a meaningless propellant, but the pyrodex RS actually produced significantly less fouling. shooting roundballs, i could have shot the pyrodex rifle all day with nary a patch between shots. however, i like the ignition qualities of blackpowder better. i got two slowfires with the pyrodex, and that was using cci magnum #11 caps (switching to musket nipple on that gun). anyway, at the end of the day when i cleaned the two guns, it took many, many more wet patches to clean the blackpowder-fouled rifle than it did to clean the pyrodex-fouled rifle. i have kind of a new found respect for the stuff . . . provided i'm getting it for $9 a pound at wally world like the can i'm shootin right now. :grin:
i shoot t7 too, but mainly in my [unspeakable] rifles. pyrodex produces less recoil and muzzleblast than t7 on a volume-for-volume basis. also, pyrodex fouling, while stickier, is softer than t7 fouling. that makes it better, in my opinion, for a day of rounball shooting . . . if you're not wanting to do a lot of between-shot swabbing.
i shoot t7 too, but mainly in my [unspeakable] rifles. pyrodex produces less recoil and muzzleblast than t7 on a volume-for-volume basis. also, pyrodex fouling, while stickier, is softer than t7 fouling. that makes it better, in my opinion, for a day of rounball shooting . . . if you're not wanting to do a lot of between-shot swabbing.