Upon reading this year's F&G manual I noticed that the old rule prohibiting PRB's in smaller than .54 cal bores has been repealed. So if I take my double rifle hunting I won't be restricted to conicals.
One of the things I've been learning reading threads on this forum is that PRB's aren't the archaic, useless objects I took them to be. And I've found they load up real nice in my rifle's bores.
Now I'm NOT planning on hunting Old Ephriam or Old Ezikiel or any other Old Testament bruins. My hunting is usually restricted to small game or at most black bear.
What I'm wondering is if the collected wise folk here think it would be plum foolish to expect a fifty cal. PRB at around 1,700 fps to stop an attack, given two barrels at my disposal. The distance involved is less than 30 yards, in fact it could be a whole lot less. I just don't know much about PRB terminal ballistics to know what kind of stopping force that would have. 1,000+ ft. lbs. is better than a .44 mag but not nearly as good as even a .30-30 in the smokeless world, but I understand different rules apply.
One of the things I've been learning reading threads on this forum is that PRB's aren't the archaic, useless objects I took them to be. And I've found they load up real nice in my rifle's bores.
Now I'm NOT planning on hunting Old Ephriam or Old Ezikiel or any other Old Testament bruins. My hunting is usually restricted to small game or at most black bear.
What I'm wondering is if the collected wise folk here think it would be plum foolish to expect a fifty cal. PRB at around 1,700 fps to stop an attack, given two barrels at my disposal. The distance involved is less than 30 yards, in fact it could be a whole lot less. I just don't know much about PRB terminal ballistics to know what kind of stopping force that would have. 1,000+ ft. lbs. is better than a .44 mag but not nearly as good as even a .30-30 in the smokeless world, but I understand different rules apply.