Capper said:
I asked a question back in the thread that go no answer. I guess the answer for everybody was no. I'll ask again.
Except for a cop. Has anybody been in a gun fight?
No, I've never had to exchange gunfire. I have trained with both military and police who have.
Back to a BP gun for protection.. I posted a video that showed a single action revolver being shot at and hit 5-6 targets in .8 of a sec. It takes practice. It's a very effective gun if you can handle it.
It can be. But the real question is, how effective is it under combat conditions compared to, say, the 1911 I described? From carry and deployment to fireing under all concievable combat scenarios, including weapon retention and using it as a bludgeon, the 1911 is superior. And I have used a Ruger Blackhawk (not a BP firearm, but is a modern single action revolver) under simulated combat conditions- so I do have a benchmark for comparison.
Most bad guys will buy a gun and never practice. They think waving it around in the general direction of the target is good enough.
There is some truth to that, but I wouldn't count on it. Guess it depends on what kind of bad guy you are going up against- and whether you have the luxury of choosing your bad guy. And there is always the possibility of its being "bad guys"; plural.
This is a strange crowd to be saying a BP gun isn't effective. Don't some of you hunt bear with a ML? Isn't your life in danger when you do that? You even go look for that.
Not really that strange. People who love to shoot and participate in an extremely practical avocation such as reinacting very practical periods are very prone to assesing and choosing the right firearm for a given scenario. And hunting dangerouse game is apples vs. oranges to getting into a life and death conflict with an armed human, or humans.
Bad guys aren't trained. They might even hesitate before shooting. One .45 cal lead ball is all you need to stop them. It's not like the movies where they keep shooting after being hit.
"Never underestimate your opponent." They may be better trained than you are.
Most people, including you (and me), will have a tendency to depend on the gun to control the situation. It is a major factor in the "pointee" being able to disarm the "pointer". So yes, usually they hesitate. But you may also cross paths with a drug altered BG, a nervouse BG, or a sociopath; any of who may not be that hesitant.
Hollywood foolishness aside (the BG either falls dead immediately, or keeps fireing with half his torso and head blown off, dependeng on the script), there are many documented cases of military and police emptying their firearms into an opponent and still being killed before the BG expired. I can think of 2 rounds and 1 gun that was designed especially to deal with this fact. The .40 Smith due to the inadequacy of the 9mm used by the FBI; and the .45 Model 1911 due to combat deficiencies with the .38 cal revolvers in the Fillipine Insurrection. With both, mortally wounded opponents carried out fatal charges with multiple hits. And as someone already pointed out, with BP more people died or were incapicated later of complications than died on the scene/field. Check records from both sides in the War Between the States if you doubt this.
So, if a BP pistol is all I have to hand then yes, it may be used effectively. However, if I was going somewhere or doing something where I thought I might need a firearm to defend my life, then I want a reliable semiauto pistol of adequate caliber and extra magazines- all in a high quality and well thought out carry system.
Not disrespecting BP, just being practical.
Dan C