This is probably not an easy issue to define in absolute terms, but it can be examined from the point of view of 'reasonableness'...does it pass the test of reasonableness, etc.
Following the logic implied in your post, when my Son and I inadvertently flushed the flock of turkeys out of their roost tree in the dark and one accidently broke it's neck and died, it would make us responsible because we caused them to flush in the dark which was unnatural for them, and caused one of them to die out of season and not during legal hunting hours even if they had been in season. We have a responsibility not to harrass wild game and cause wanton destruction to wildlife.
It's the law for us to be responsible and drive our vehicles under our control at all times.
But a deer darts out in front of you while driving and you kill it with your vehicle...on your way to go deer hunting during hunting season...do you file a report and use one of your deer tags on that deer that you just took?
If it happened out of deer season, should you be fined for taking a deer out of season?
No, that's not the intent and purpose of the laws.
Laws are passed as deterrents to prevent people from INTENTIONALLY doing something inappropriate...like if my Son and I had intentionally killed that turkey, in the dark in their roost tree, out of season, no question that would be a violation of the law and penalties would have been completely appropriate.
How about on a dove shoot...you have one left to fill your limit, another flock comes pouring in over the field flying every which way, abruptly changing direction like doves do when someone shoots here, someone shoots there, etc...you see one, take a shot and get your last dove, but one stray pellet continuing on 20yds farther accidently downs an additional dove that just darted down into the path of the shot charge as your shot was leaving the barrel, and you're now over the federally imposed limit of doves...by pure accident...yet your post states that he is responsible for every shot he takes, good or bad.
I don't believe the dove shooter was irresponsible, nor do I believe he should (or would) feel responsible to turn himself in, and under the federal migratory laws and penalties, lose his shotgun, his equipment, his vehicle, be heavily fined, etc.
No, not the intent and purpose of the laws.
My point earlier was simply this...based upon the fact that there are overzealous people in all types of jobs, it stands to reason there is a typical representation of them in law enforcement jobs too, and you go up to one and try to be a hero with some of the scenarios we just discussed, you stand a good chance of not having "the intent and purpose of the law" applied, and you'll end up with major penalties that are inappropriate for the accidental circumstances that occurred.
:m2c: