Actually I have run businesses, I still do..., I understand how they came to their decision. I simply do not like that fact, as I also understand the larger picture.I can see you have never ran a business? It all boils down to profit. You can't blame a company for their actions if there is no profit or very little profit. If an explosion was the cause how did Dupont survive all their past problems?
Ever heard of Domino sugar? It's a consumable sold in grocery stores?
Did you know that many grocery stores sell this product at ZERO profit?
Did you know that many grocery stores sell this at a LOSS?
IF your argument were 100% valid, then you could not buy sugar at grocery stores, OR you'd be paying a lot more for your sugar, especially would the folks who shop at a corner market. Sugar is NOT essential. Folks will be fine without sugar, AND there are lots of substitutes that work as well as sugar that do earn the grocery stores a profit. Just as black powder is not "essential" and there are lots of substitutes that can work that are profitable....
Hodgdon is linked to this product because they chose to buy it, then they chose to produce it, and then they chose to discontinue it, .... for whatever reason. They could also choose to absorb the loss as well as the grocery store absorbs their losses on sugar, because the loss is eliminated by folks buying their other products. They could choose spend the money, keep a portion of that small town employed, and raise the price..., they did not.
OH and they'd mitigate their profit loss by selling off the remaining plant to Scheutzen...., allow them to deal with the problem.... but there are no plans to do this...so much for the "profit and loss diving decisions argument"...
I simply find fault with that. Others can chose to do otherwise. I've never suggested anyone should emulate my actions on this.
LD