GENERAL COMMENT POSTING:
IMO, the modern use of the model name Hawken is not an irritant that registers on the radar of the general population of ML users at all...its only a tiny few who want to make an issue out of any post that inadvertently uses the term Hawken, and they do so knowing full well that the context of the occasional poster is not claiming any of the mass produced Hawken's to be an original Hawken.
I sure am glad that people who are into horses as a hobby or a business don't get themselves all worked up over and take issue with every conversation where the model name Mustang or Pinto comes up...or that people in Africa don't constantly take issue with every conversation where the model name Impala comes up.
If a serious discussion is taking place in a historical context about original Hawkens, then that's fine and it should be clarified in the context of that particular conversation...but I know I'm not the only one on this forum who is sick and tired of that same old worn out mantra being trotted out ad nausem whenever the term Hawken is used when it's obvious as the sun rising in the east there is no attempt to be using it to pass off a modern made ML as an original Hawken.
In fact, I'm going on record right now...from now on, in spite if my personal track record of always wasting my time to type the letters T/C in front of the word Hawken when I use it because of a minority of individuals who like to challenge it, I'm intentionally just going to start using the word Hawken...it'll be fun to sit back and see just how much heartburn it causes, and who it gives heartburn to...and I'll start right now:
I'm planning on going hunting tomorrow...certainly for deer and possibly for squirrels...when I do, I'm going to use my .62cal rifled Hawken for deer and my .28ga smoothbore Hawken for squirrels.
:thumbsup:
IMO, the modern use of the model name Hawken is not an irritant that registers on the radar of the general population of ML users at all...its only a tiny few who want to make an issue out of any post that inadvertently uses the term Hawken, and they do so knowing full well that the context of the occasional poster is not claiming any of the mass produced Hawken's to be an original Hawken.
I sure am glad that people who are into horses as a hobby or a business don't get themselves all worked up over and take issue with every conversation where the model name Mustang or Pinto comes up...or that people in Africa don't constantly take issue with every conversation where the model name Impala comes up.
If a serious discussion is taking place in a historical context about original Hawkens, then that's fine and it should be clarified in the context of that particular conversation...but I know I'm not the only one on this forum who is sick and tired of that same old worn out mantra being trotted out ad nausem whenever the term Hawken is used when it's obvious as the sun rising in the east there is no attempt to be using it to pass off a modern made ML as an original Hawken.
In fact, I'm going on record right now...from now on, in spite if my personal track record of always wasting my time to type the letters T/C in front of the word Hawken when I use it because of a minority of individuals who like to challenge it, I'm intentionally just going to start using the word Hawken...it'll be fun to sit back and see just how much heartburn it causes, and who it gives heartburn to...and I'll start right now:
I'm planning on going hunting tomorrow...certainly for deer and possibly for squirrels...when I do, I'm going to use my .62cal rifled Hawken for deer and my .28ga smoothbore Hawken for squirrels.
:thumbsup: