The 16 gauge variant has a thin barrel. It is not as rigid as the 20. If attempting to use the 16 for round ball accuracy is probably going to be poor.
Exactly. I've a .58 smooth for round ball so when I get around to ordering one of these it'll be the 16ga to be used with shot loads only.Kibler also offers smoothbore options in the Colonial kit. I assembled the .58 cal smooth Colonial and it turned out quit well:
https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/...l-58-caliber-smoothbore-maximum-bling.181896/
https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/...bore-maximum-bling.181896/page-2#post-2644081
For those interested you might want to check out our recent youtube video discussing the historical context of these fowling guns we are selling. Seems there is generally some misunderstanding regarding trade guns, fowlers etc. Much of this is simply because of products available today and names assigned, but all this is much less distinct and subtle.
Seems like you are thinking of a Northwest Trade Gun style with the large guard comment. Your choice should depends on preference and how confident you are to do the inletting on a kit that requires those skills, versus assembly and finishing of a Kibler kit.
I have to agree.I will echo Rich here. Northwest trade gun kits or trade gun kits in general are not the easiest kits for a beginner skill set.
The Kibler Fowler will be much easier to build.
I have to agree.
Surface mounting the butt plate and the trigger guard on an English
Indian trade gun is the easy part. Inletting the octagon to round barrel after soldering on the barrel lugs and front sight takes some time.
The other inletting and stock finishing of course would be the same for other precarved kits.
The Kibler fowler kit is far easier.
Full disclosure I just brought home a "ready to ship" 16 gauge cherry Kibler fowler kit even though I own many other smooth bores. It is just well done!
Oh yes, I live fire .62 round balls out of my modified Miroku 1766 now 1728 model; .69 balls out my custom British long land musket; and .62 round ball out of my L. Day Dutch fowler with very good accuracy at 50 yards.
Would you like to understand why? I’d be happy to help.Maybe or Maybe not...!
Link?For those interested you might want to check out our recent youtube video discussing the historical context of these fowling guns we are selling. Seems there is generally some misunderstanding regarding trade guns, fowlers etc. Much of this is simply because of products available today and names assigned, but all this is much less distinct and subtle.
I have to agree.
Surface mounting the butt plate and the trigger guard on an English
Indian trade gun is the easy part. Inletting the octagon to round barrel after soldering on the barrel lugs and front sight takes some time.
The other inletting and stock finishing of course would be the same for other precarved kits.
The Kibler fowler kit is far easier.
Full disclosure I just brought home a "ready to ship" 16 gauge cherry Kibler fowler kit even though I own many other smooth bores. It is just well done!
Oh yes, I live fire .62 round balls out of my modified Miroku 1766 now 1728 model; .69 balls out my custom British long land musket; and .62 round ball out of my L. Day Dutch fowler with very good accuracy at 50 yards.
I don’t really care if you like our products, I just value accurate information.
I made the comment that our kits are better quality than other offerings and will finish into a better gun.
You said maybe or maybe not. I am prepared to support my statement as to why this is true. If you already understand, there is no need for me to explain.
Enter your email address to join: