I'm looking at buying my first 'better quality' muzzleloader. I've had & shot a few CVA/Traditions rifles, but I'm looking to up my game (so to speak)
I'm really wanting a fullstock in .50cal, but a nice Hawken style also appeals to me. I'm wanting it purely for hunting. At the moment I'm 50/50 split between a flinter or percussion but I'm gradually leaning towards flint, purely for it's aesthetic appeal.
I've been looking at the Tennessee rifle offered by TVM & also the Lyman GPR;. I know the Lyman is a cheaper option, but everyone seems to regard them very highly. My question is; Would I really benefeit from dropping close to $1000 on the TVM Tennessee or would I be better served by buying the GPR & saving a few shekels? Would I notice a great difference in quality & if so, where? (fit & finish/shootability/accuracy etc...)
I'm really wanting a fullstock in .50cal, but a nice Hawken style also appeals to me. I'm wanting it purely for hunting. At the moment I'm 50/50 split between a flinter or percussion but I'm gradually leaning towards flint, purely for it's aesthetic appeal.
I've been looking at the Tennessee rifle offered by TVM & also the Lyman GPR;. I know the Lyman is a cheaper option, but everyone seems to regard them very highly. My question is; Would I really benefeit from dropping close to $1000 on the TVM Tennessee or would I be better served by buying the GPR & saving a few shekels? Would I notice a great difference in quality & if so, where? (fit & finish/shootability/accuracy etc...)