- Joined
- Dec 25, 2011
- Messages
- 9,609
- Reaction score
- 4,754
Now you've moved the goal posts! What happened to short arbor guns being inaccurate and likely to fail in the end of the arbor slot? I get that end fit may have been universal in original Colts ( I doubt you've actually checked many ,if any) but don't agree that it is critical to accuracy or longevity.Well, they aren't my "theories", it's the Colt design. You tend to think the Italians make Colt style revolvers better than Colt. They don't.
My point was made after your explanation of the all important wedge thickness blah blah . . . you can't seem to understand that the depth of the wedge means zilch if the arbor is bottoming out. After the clearance is removed with the wedge installed (under tension) it doesn't matter how much more you drive the wedge in, it won't change the endshake !! . . . which is the whole point!!
So, if you're not going to impart any tension on the Union of the 2 assemblies when the spacer is installed, why bother with continuing your experiment? In other words, if you're not going to do it right, why bother?
A loose fit wedge with or without a spacer makes no difference. It's not the " presence " of a spacer that counts . . . it's the actual use of the spacer taking up space and being under tension (because the wedge is PULLING the BARREL assembly AGAINST the end of the arbor!! Why is that so hard to understand?
Mike
As to the bother, I want to know if you and your cadre are full of crap or not!