I've been able to compare the lion/lamb and the 'Griffin' Oerter rifle side by side and I've come to view them as certainly being carved by the same man. I realize some would say, "Well, Albrecht trained Oerter so maybe Albrecht carved L/L and later on Oerter carved the Griffin rifle when he ran the CS shop." That's a valid point, but I simply believe Oerter carved them both. We only have a small window into Oerter's work for a couple of years prior to the outbreak of the War, but there is nothing signed for the near-decade he was running the shop after Albrecht's departure and prior to the signed and dated rifles. Having studied old Northampton Co. for a very long time now, it was clear that style and design was rapidly changing and over in Allentown, Johannes Moll was a very established gunsmith who was approximately the same age as Albrecht. How he may have been influencing arms development in the region is unknown but it seems clear to me that after Oerter died, the CS shop slowly fizzled out and where Albrehct and Oerter may have been the 'influencers' (hahahaha) in the region before the War, Moll and those he probably trained to some extent (Herman and John Rupp, possibly Neihart also) were the drivers of style in the entire western portion of the county after the War and into the 19th century (the portion that became Lehigh Co.). Anyway just a roundabout way of saying I view the L/L and the Griffin rifle as being the same guy, and Oerter signed and dated one of them.
The two tailed dog is a different story. It's unfortunate that it's been much more worn and restored, which sometimes blurs comparison. I am aware of Jud's information that was relayed above - the problem is that multiple people have relayed information from Jud Brennan about the restoration over the years, including the original owner who had the resto work done, and the story has changed over time. So all I can say is that I've been told multiple stories as to what was original and what was replaced and I don't particularly know what to believe. I simply don't see it as being the same hand as the L/L or other Moravian-attributed rifles but it's simply a "gut feel" on my part viewing it as potentially a preWar Peter Neihart. Neihart was very creative, probably more so than the Molls or the Rupps, and seemed willing to vary his style more than others. Unfortunately the rifle is unsigned so until another signed one turns up we're hopelessly doomed to speculate!