- Joined
- Mar 19, 2020
- Messages
- 77
- Reaction score
- 93
Parts interchangeability accompanies the CNC locks, makes it easier to repair if needed.
Nothing wrong with Chambers products. The fanboys just want the latest and greatest. While it is precisely made, I don't see how Mr. Laubach's lock is $200 faster in lock time than one of Jim's. However, it does fit a style category that some may want for their work.
I don't have recent Chambers lock to compare, but Jim recently changed the design of the Late Ketland. Can't say how it compares with the old design. After a friend got his early-batch Laubach, I cancelled my order for one. Then he sent his back so I can't comment on how they work. The demo lock I saw at the CLA show looked good and sparked well. I like the lock, but I would buy one only after I had it in hand to inspect.
What needs to be tuned on a Kibler lock? You stated "work must be done".I've tuned a couple hundred locks over the years, and blueprinted hundreds of bolt and single shot actions. I found the Kibler needs the least work to get the performance I want. Chambers makes a good lock, but I do spend a couple hours fully tuning one. Could probably do it faster, but I don't rush things. I have had a cock and one or two springs break on Chambers locks, but they are fast getting a replacement part to you.
Having programmed CNCs before, there is more to it than that. One often over-looked concept to the lay person is which way the tool feeds into the stock, by conventional milling (teeth cut into the part against the feed) or climb milling (teeth cut with the feed). The difference can account for the surface finish as well as meeting tolerances, and is dependent on the geometry being cut.I wish these guys making CNC locks would flip their programming data over and start making lefties! C'mon fellows, how hard can it be!!!!
And a few matchlocks, wheellocks and snaphaunces would be outstanding...I wish these guys making CNC locks would flip their programming data over and start making lefties! C'mon fellows, how hard can it be!!!!
Robby
Haha ... perhaps we might see LH'd flintlocks 1st ...And a few matchlocks, wheellocks and snaphaunces would be outstanding...
You are correct. I'm a retired mechanical engineer. I never programed a CNC, but I know full well about cutting teeth. Some of the cutters would have to be reversed to cut effectively. It can be done, but one has to consider the capital expenditure for something that would receive less than 10% of sales. It would almost be more effective to purchase a dedicated CNC, which is a huge capital outlay.Having programmed CNCs before, there is more to it than that. One often over-looked concept to the lay person is which way the tool feeds into the stock, by conventional milling (teeth cut into the part against the feed) or climb milling (teeth cut with the feed). The difference can account for the surface finish as well as meeting tolerances, and is dependent on the geometry being cut.
So personally, as a lefty and as a former machinsit, I'm not surprised one bit that they haven't made lefty locks yet ...
Dear Treestalker. Much as I am somewhat devoted to archaic stuff and In fact I am 'Archaic stuff' I cant really see there would be any huge demand for them. But I can remember when new flintlocks where not that common. So who knows it could be' The new way backwards ' Navy Arms offered two sorts of Wheellocks years ago but I recall there was little general interest . The great boom of interest in muzzle loading may have subsided but the keen seem to be more emaginitive and have in many cases been very studious as this forum frequently illustrates .And a few matchlocks, wheellocks and snaphaunces would be outstanding...
Something to consider in the above mentioned is that all production of parts is or at least was initially outsourced IIRC. Is that still the case? I don't know but am curious.I knows a guy. His name is Chris Laubach. He’s made a complete CNC lock. I’ll go with real data on how long it takes and what it costs versus informed estimates from someone who has not made one.
Something to consider in the above mentioned is that all production of parts is or at least was initially outsourced IIRC. Is that still the case? I don't know but am curious.
I agree; it would have to be a labor of love, a most rare item in today's world.Dear Treestalker. Much as I am somewhat devoted to archaic stuff and In fact I am 'Archaic stuff' I cant really see there would be any huge demand for them. But I can remember when new flintlocks where not that common. So who knows it could be' The new way backwards ' Navy Arms offered two sorts of Wheellocks years ago but I recall there was little general interest . The great boom of interest in muzzle loading may have subsided but the keen seem to be more emaginitive and have in many cases been very studious as this forum frequently illustrates .
Regards Rudyard
Blasphemy! LOL!Haha ... perhaps we might see LH'd flintlocks 1st ...
Enter your email address to join: