- Joined
- Jul 30, 2013
- Messages
- 6,595
- Reaction score
- 302
Pardon me for pointing out that YOUR RIGHTS are in NO way superior to anyone else's RIGHTS. = It is therefore my contention that things like smoking in cafes/bars/etc. should be left strictly up to the OWNER of the private property & NO outdoor area should be allowed to be designated "a prohibited area".
(NOBODY has the RIGHT to NOT "be offended by" any other person's lawful behavior.)
Moreover, IF I own a café/bar & choose to allow smoking, it's NOBODY's business but MINE & those who are "bothered by 2nd hand smoke" can go ELSEWHERE. = That's the meaning of "private property".
Furher, the "public nannies & anti-smoking/anti-alcohol "crazies" are now trying to prohibit smoking/alcohol in people's own homes, on their private property & within personal vehicles (to quote one CA Congress-critter), "if anyone in the general public objects to their unhealthful behavior".
To me, one of the BEST parts of The US Constitution says, "Congress shall make no law prohibiting - - - - -".
yours, satx
(NOBODY has the RIGHT to NOT "be offended by" any other person's lawful behavior.)
Moreover, IF I own a café/bar & choose to allow smoking, it's NOBODY's business but MINE & those who are "bothered by 2nd hand smoke" can go ELSEWHERE. = That's the meaning of "private property".
Furher, the "public nannies & anti-smoking/anti-alcohol "crazies" are now trying to prohibit smoking/alcohol in people's own homes, on their private property & within personal vehicles (to quote one CA Congress-critter), "if anyone in the general public objects to their unhealthful behavior".
To me, one of the BEST parts of The US Constitution says, "Congress shall make no law prohibiting - - - - -".
yours, satx