The question that can't be answered here is "how much less" for each?
My experiences / educated instincts tell me the combined energy transfer of both balls would still be significantly more than a single ball.
And at typical woods-shot-distances, a little reduction in MV shouldn't be a deal breaker at all...the differences (on game) would certainly show at 100-125yds for sure.
In my upcoming fall field test, if I get a normal woods shot at a deer and the D-PRB load doesnt do its job I'll be right here following up with the bad results.
But so far...my field test with the custom .40cal conical successfully delivered as predicted...the solid brass ball successfully delivered as predicted...and I'll be shocked if my D-PRB .45cal load is not successful.
And that's why I'm pursuing it...for the first hand experience either way it goes
My experiences / educated instincts tell me the combined energy transfer of both balls would still be significantly more than a single ball.
And at typical woods-shot-distances, a little reduction in MV shouldn't be a deal breaker at all...the differences (on game) would certainly show at 100-125yds for sure.
In my upcoming fall field test, if I get a normal woods shot at a deer and the D-PRB load doesnt do its job I'll be right here following up with the bad results.
But so far...my field test with the custom .40cal conical successfully delivered as predicted...the solid brass ball successfully delivered as predicted...and I'll be shocked if my D-PRB .45cal load is not successful.
And that's why I'm pursuing it...for the first hand experience either way it goes