I'd go with the Sitting fox Smooth Dutch barn gun personally
http://sittingfoxmuzzleloaders.com/k-41/
Simple, usable and well made.
http://sittingfoxmuzzleloaders.com/k-41/
Simple, usable and well made.
Last edited by a moderator:
radman said:Spikebuck that is exactly what I want in my next weapon,right down to the wood patchbox.do you mind telling me who made it and roughly what it cost?
Thanks for clearing that up for us. :bow: :bow:markm7737 said:you are wrong..17th/18th c. fowling pieces never had rear sights adjustable or mounted..however some would work a groove in the rear tang area..hardly a rear sight .
1719 National Mvzzleloading Rifle Affociation Rvles
markm7737 said:you are wrong..17th/18th c. fowling pieces never had rear sights adjustable or mounted..however some would work a groove in the rear tang area..hardly a rear sight .
markm7737 said:you are wrong..17th/18th c. fowling pieces never had rear sights adjustable or mounted..however some would work a groove in the rear tang area..hardly a rear sight .
Sorry been absent.smoothshooter said:What kind of groups do you get at 25, 50, 75, and 100 meters? I have had thoughts of getting a .45 or .50 caliber smooth rifle.
Pete D. said:Isn't "smoothrifle" a contradiction in terms? What makes a "rifle" is rifling. Everything else...stock, rear sight.... is an embellishment so as to make the best use of the rifled barrel.
I understand that the term is in common use; it doesn't seem to be an accurate descriptor.
Enter your email address to join: