SlidePicker
40 Cal
I understood that as another way of saying "rule of thumb."Could you elaborate on this? I get FFF builds more pressure, just don’t understand the thumbnail part
I understood that as another way of saying "rule of thumb."Could you elaborate on this? I get FFF builds more pressure, just don’t understand the thumbnail part
Longcruise, What was the powder charge used for your tables in grains and granulation? Was it black powder or a substitute? 70 grains of FFFg in my .54 caliber with a 33 and 1/3 inch long barrel as a flint and percussion is sufficient for actual harvests on deer, elk and antelope to a hundred yards and beyond. My goal and preference is get close as you can. Last pronghorn bagged was 15 yards.
A Thompson Center White Mountain Carbine
How do you explain a .41 cal at 410 lbs at muzzle double lungs, in & exit at est. 30 yds on tick toters n not a fluke. Foot lbs energy scale is a jokeWhere do you think tissue damage comes from? Since you can't measure tissue damage with a chronometer, you got to use what CAUSES tissue damage to measure it.
Well documented studies of energy/tissue damage/bullet types abound.
Helps if you read the articles provided before commenting.
800 ftlbs for deer, 1000 ftlbs for elk
http://www.namlhunt.com/rbhunting1.html
Lets see those short barrels make 2050fps, my 42 inch barrel does.Very long barrels are highly overrated
And on-off anecdotal evidence is rock solid? These there I was, shooting my old thumblicker stories are starting to remind me of those fellows hanging around gun stores with a toothpick hanging out of their mouth, hat on the back of their head telling improbable tales while scratching their bellies.How do you explain a .41 cal at 410 lbs at muzzle double lungs, in & exit at est. 30 yds on tick toters n not a fluke. Foot lbs energy scale is a joke
Nope, I've got several different reports written at Springfield Armory during the US Civil War testing the accuracy and range differences between "infantry rifles" compared to the "Calvary Carbine".Hmmm.. I always thought a carbine by definition was a repeating arm.???
It’s easy to get within 200yds of a deer, the challenge for a hunter is to get close enough to smell their breath - every time. Can’t always do it, its very hard but thats the game for me. Then, what you carry doesn’t matter much. My hunt this year was not great, got my groceries but I had to shoot at a range I don’t usually have to - 60 yds. A ‘normal’ shot tor me is a little under 20, i’m getting clumsier by the month..Everything he says is spot on, except i don’t think you need x amount of energy to kill a deer, or a Buffalo. A hole near a half inch through lungs or heart or in to the spine puts Bambi in the table.
However, there is nothing magic about ball. It is the worse possible projectile
Hunt with ball you need to stay close. You can learn your range. So I’m not going to slap anyone who took a muley at a hundred and fifty yards, but I think a round a hundred should be max. And fifty is better, twenty five is best.
Conicals buy you some range. A maxi, real,minnie is hands down better than ball.
But a 30-06 or even a 30-30 is hands down better then any ml.
If you hunt with smoke poles and the biggest joke ever played on shooters, ie round balls, if your depending on flint sparks and a dark are explosive then hunt with it like it in primitive form
Of course you're correct, as far as it goes. I look at things from a different point of view since nearly all my hunting shots have been at close range so I don't need 2050 fps to make a clean kill. I suspect a 54 caliber ball at 1000 fps will kill anything I need to shoot. I'm out of the Brown Bear country now but when I was there I sure didn't fool around in the bush with a muzzle loader. I packed a lever action 45-70 with some hot smokeless loads. Luckily I never needed it!Lets see those short barrels make 2050fps, my 42 inch barrel does.
What has pledged shooters of black powder is the only was t get more speed and distance is to make the barrel longer.
This follow into BPC. In order to get more distance they kept adding a 1/2 inch to the cartridge.
Thats why the 45/70 led tot eh 45/90. 45/100. and the 45/120.
All in the quest to shoot further.
This depends on the terrain and time of yearIt’s easy to get within 200yds of a deer
My my you want to be the expert of the experts but you an't so stop the pompus spoutingAnd on-off anecdotal evidence is rock solid? These there I was, shooting my old thumblicker stories are starting to remind me of those fellows hanging around gun stores with a toothpick hanging out of their mouth, hat on the back of their head telling improbable tales while scratching their bellies.
Keep shooting what you want, hell even start your own improbable story thread.
This depends on the terrain and time of year
I'll bet it can be tough unless you have a thick river bottom.
The idea that hunting in the Rockies is typically a long range proposition is not exactly correct. It certainly can be but not always. I bow hunt and ml hunt the same country and manage to be mostly in timber.
I have some buddies that strictly spot and stock bow hunt on western Kansas. They have my respectI'll bet it can be tough unless you have a thick river bottom.
The idea that hunting in the Rockies is typically a long range proposition is not exactly correct. It certainly can be but not always. I bow hunt and ml hunt the same country and manage to be mostly in timber.
Conicals fired in a breech loader are a world of difference from a PRBLets see those short barrels make 2050fps, my 42 inch barrel does.
What has pledged shooters of black powder is the only was t get more speed and distance is to make the barrel longer.
This follow into BPC. In order to get more distance they kept adding a 1/2 inch to the cartridge.
Thats why the 45/70 led tot eh 45/90. 45/100. and the 45/120.
All in the quest to shoot further.
Enter your email address to join: