GomezMunoz1951
Pilgrim
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2013
- Messages
- 111
- Reaction score
- 105
When anti-gunner claim that our forefathers had no clue about anything more advanced than muskets bring up these...
I came across references to these guns and was wondering why some enterprising person didn't start making them just for kicks.
Back years ago in the NMLRA Muzzleblasts magazine a guy built a gatling gun that was .58 caliber. He made tubes that had a nipple on the back, BP was loaded and a .58 minie ball could be slid in and sealed the tube. It had a magazine that fit into a slot on the top of the gun just like the commercial Gatling guns. It had pictures of him firing it. Looked awesome.
The Puckle would be a blast (pun intended) to shoot.
Now as for the the Girandoni rifle. Just what would it be classified as. It looks like a musket but was a repeater but used air. Apparently it was quite deadly and had a fairly long range. Lewis and Clark had one on their trip. It seems like there would be a company that could produce something like that today.
I came across references to these guns and was wondering why some enterprising person didn't start making them just for kicks.
Back years ago in the NMLRA Muzzleblasts magazine a guy built a gatling gun that was .58 caliber. He made tubes that had a nipple on the back, BP was loaded and a .58 minie ball could be slid in and sealed the tube. It had a magazine that fit into a slot on the top of the gun just like the commercial Gatling guns. It had pictures of him firing it. Looked awesome.
The Puckle would be a blast (pun intended) to shoot.
Now as for the the Girandoni rifle. Just what would it be classified as. It looks like a musket but was a repeater but used air. Apparently it was quite deadly and had a fairly long range. Lewis and Clark had one on their trip. It seems like there would be a company that could produce something like that today.