user 49399
54 Cal.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2020
- Messages
- 1,583
- Reaction score
- 2,727
Do you consider the Traditions Deerhunter flintlock with synthetic stock to be a traditional muzzleloader? It is a flintlock after all.
I would call it not traditionally styled!I would call it…Traditionally Styled….
Like I said, it's an abomination, but not in a bad way. To go further, if you really think about it, what is the difference in a modern barrel using modern steel and a modern stock using modern materials? They are both anachronistic. The only difference is the looks. I say it's a historic abomination, but so are almost all of our reproductions. This one is just easier to visually identify.I guess it's traditional sort of, but I have a question. Synthetic stocks were developed to be water-resistant, wood warps. There isn't a flintlock out there that could be considered truly waterproof.
So you're wrapping a less than reliable ignition system with a stock that buried in the ground would still look the same 200 years from now?
Yeah, in it's essence.Do you consider the Traditions Deerhunter flintlock with synthetic stock to be a traditional muzzleloader? It is a flintlock after all.
I guess it's traditional sort of, but I have a question. Synthetic stocks were developed to be water-resistant, wood warps. There isn't a flintlock out there that could be considered truly waterproof.
So you're wrapping a less than reliable ignition system with a stock that buried in the ground would still look the same 200 years from now?
Yeah, in it's essence.
But you know as well as everyone else that it's the ******* child of a second cousin.
He's welcome to the table dine,, but he's not gonna marry Sadie Ellen Hawken.
We like those plastic stock gun's at our traditional shoot's,,
,,hanging from a rope at the 50yrd line,,
Enter your email address to join: