Larry Pletcher
50 Cal.
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2006
- Messages
- 1,313
- Reaction score
- 67
TRR said:Wow! Thanks Pletch. I'm really showing my lack of understanding here! I was figuring 2/16 = 1/8 and that would be the next largest size bit. You saved me on that one. As you can tell, not much experience in the machining dept. You folks have been talking about #2 and #5 bits, but I didn't get it. They must be sizes in between the standard sizes. Should I mess with them or go right to a 5/64?
Thank again,
TR
TR,
I just looked up my MuzzleBlasts article to see which ones I used in the tests. Below are numbered bits falling between 1/16" and too big. The starred ones were included in my tests.
1/16" (.0625")*
no. 52 (.0635")
no. 51 (.0670")
no. 50 (.070") *
no. 49 (.0730")
no. 48 (.076")
5/64" (.078") *
no. 45 (.086") *
If you want, you could sneak up on the proper size for your gun by starting with a no. 52 and go larger until you are satisfied with the gun's performance.
I personally like a no. 50 (.070") and feel that 5/16" borders on too large. But each situation is different. I'd guess that a no. 50 or a no. 49 will be getting pretty close. I've told shooters in the past that 5/64" is probably as large as I'd go and to sneak up on it if you have to go that large.
This January I want to start a timing test to see if I can tell the difference between a too high or too low vent hole location in the pan. The vent I will be using is a Chambers liner drilled to .070" with a slight exterior cone. I chose that diameter because it performed well in the Feb 2000 tests. That's why I expect you to do well as you get close to that diameter.
Regards,
Pletch