OK, now it's starting to make sense. Heavier powder charge and bullet more recoil and possible movement of cylinder, barrel etc. Gotcha, and since my revolver has held up all these years , in my case it's not a big concern.
OK, now it's starting to make sense. Heavier powder charge and bullet more recoil and possible movement of cylinder, barrel etc. Gotcha, and since my revolver has held up all these years , in my case it's not a big concern.
Hi Mike I have my Col 2nd Gen 1851 Navy boxed up, i just have to get a box to fit it all in, and I will be shipping it on out to you.Exactly. If it's OK with you then there's no problem. But at least now you know ( yer edgumacated!!).
Mike
Yes, I mean my Second Gen Colt Dragoon wedge seats and comes out with a firm push of two thumbs, i dont know how I would make it tighter other than fitting a new wedgeAfter reading some of the earlier posts I realized some things should be answered... forgive me if these are already answered. Wedge fit should be a firm fit with a plastic or non marring hammer tapped in until it stops, of course the arbor length should be fixed. Barrel/cylinder gap ideally should be about .002 with a max of .004. When the arbor is correct you have the same pistol each time it's assembled. If the wedge is a loose fit the gun hammers itself into being looser and looser until it gets to the point of becoming a paperweight. The arbor fix is an easy one so why not do it and save a ton of work down the road. 45D has a theory that a short arbor causes a destructive harmonic to happen that shakes the gun apart. I happen to agree with him. It seems the bigger the gun, like Walkers and Dragoons the more intense the vibration and damage becomes. The fitted arbor helps lock everything together so it vibrates as a single piece. Hope this makes sense.
Would it not possible to get a picture or two?a very competent and experienced gunsmith recommended a #10 split (lock) washer for a short arbor correction.
My Uberti Dragoon was cured with a brass washer JB welded to the end of the arbor then filed to fit.
My Pietta revolvers do not have that problem.
That is my experience
Not really, a smack with a hammer will change your mind as well as the measurement.I bought an Pietta 1861 Navy, and it’s Arbour seems to be fit.The wedge only goes in soo far, and does not change the gap between cylinder face and forcing cone..maby by 0.001” but that’s it, as i think its normal for the wedge to squeeze the barrel on
Whats going on Mike?Not really, a smack with a hammer will change your mind as well as the measurement.
Even though it's a current Pietta, "thumb pressure" isn't enough.
Mike
Hey Gino753!!Whats going on Mike?
So I fixed my Second Gen Dragoon I made a shim, and adjusted the thickness until the wedge was able to go in again..as in if the spacer was too thick..then the wedge would not go in all the way so that the spring cleared the other side of the barrel.I filed the shim down until it did
And when the barrel is tested by installing the barrel with the lug off to the side, im exactly lined up with the frame now
Is that good?
is there an image of what to do with said washer?Good tip on using the #10 brass washers
Yes so, it does go in a bit further, but the gap between the forcing come pretty much reduces by 0.001”Hey Gino753!!
I hear ya and that would be "proper procedure" . . . but only if you're "smacking" the wedge in when "test fitting". Just through enough for the "spring to clear" doesn't mean anything if it's not "driven in".
That's what's wrong with using "thumb pressure". "Thumb pressure" will never be a match for a good smack with a plastic hammer! NONE of my open-tops will go together with correct tolerances with "thumb pressure".
All that being said, what happens when you "smack" your wedge with a hammer? Probably goes in further . . . meaning your spacer is a little too thin.
I never ever "test" with the barrel assy "out of line". It'll lie every time
Mike
You drop it down the arbor hole, in hopes to take up space,is there an image of what to do with said washer?