Weighing RBs?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
"The name of the game is the same." Advice given to me by competitive shooters years ago. Variables in the barrel create variables at the target, whether it be paper or game. I weigh all my powder charges and balls, and make my own patches and lube. When you know everything is as consistent as you can make it, the less you have to think about other than sights, breath, squeeze, and follow through. Confidence. Other quote, "If you think it helps, it does."

ADK Bigfoot
 
Depends on the type shooting you are doing. I weigh balls when working up loads for a new rifle. My shooting is generally woods walks, and maximum accuracy isn't necessary. Most beneficial for benchrest shooters.
 
Do any of you weigh your cast RBs and group them for shooting?
Do you find that it improves accuracy?
I have done it but I was surprised that my accuracy was pretty much the same with either? If I was as annal
Do any of you weigh your cast RBs and group them for shooting?
Do you find that it improves accuracy?
My .54 balls weigh 226 grains on an average only varying 2 to 3 grains at the extremes. I really can't tell any difference in the accuracy one from another? I still will do it when I am searching for minute of angle groups at a 100 yards. It has been a long time since I could .
 
Other variables, like concentration, trigger pull, and flinch will affect ball flight far more than a few tenths of a grain/.3% difference in ball weight.

Weighing balls gives people something to do, and it may help with the mental game, but it has no appreciable impact on accuracy.

I can see weighing balls if your goal is to cull out grossly underweight/misshapen balls but that's it.
 
Last edited:
Been doing this for around 45 years and have never weighed a ball. Over 99% of my shooting has been in competition or in practicing for competition. Over half has been for cross sticks or light bench. In the early days I used commercially made balls but since I started casting them myself my accuracy is much better. I use only single cavity molds so I don't have to deal with the variation in cavities. I look at each ball as it comes out of the mold. If it has a hole in the sprue, looks wrinkled or dull it goes back in the pot. I have won my fair share of matches over the years.
 
I have to use cast bismuth alloy for hunting here in CA. I don't sweat +/- a couple of grains on either side of the average of 143 grains for a .480 ball. But much more than that, I just throw it back in the melting pot. For my lead balls where I'm just punching paper or ringing steel, I look for oddities but don't bother to weigh them.
 
I weigh the balls I cast. 45 caliber and below I keep balls that are +/- .5 grains of the average. For .50 caliber and above, I keep balls that are +/- 1.0 grains of the average. All balls that fall outside of these parameters are thrown back in the pot. I have found that balls that vary more than 2 grains in the small calibers and 3+ grains in the larger calibers tend to fall outside of my groups, and they are not called flyers.
I'm retired, so spending the extra time is not a big deal to me. As said in one of the earlier posts, Consistency is the name of the game.
 
I was lucky to know and shoot with a master class pistol shooter and he weighed all his RB and selected the ones for competition that were within one grain of each other. The others were for tin can work.:ghostly:
 
When you bought a rifle gun on the frontier you got a rifle, cover, worm, mould and set of balance scale accurate to one tenth of a grain. For the balance a ball had been cast in silver or sometimes gold to be the exact weight for your gun
By the time of the mountain men and western fur trade spring scales were accurate to one one hundredth of a grain. Although you likely got only a lead ball etched to mark it so you wouldn’t accidentally shoot it.
SJ and S Rocky Mountian fur had eight mules loaded with just spring scales in 1828.
In 1833 Danial Potts was attacked by Arapaho and lost most of his kit. He almost starved while making a run on foot to Bents Fort. He had plenty of lead and his mold but had lost his scale, so he was unable to replenish his shooting pouch after he ran out of ball and was unable to hunt
I weigh my ball as often as Simon Girty,Daniel Boone, Joe Meek and other faceless frontiersmen did theirs 😊
 
In my early days when I was an obsessed 'X' hunter I weighed to 1/10th of a grain. Later I eased up a bit to 1 grain. Then later I simply examined my balls for air pockets, etc. and kept all that looked good without weighing. Accuracy unchanged.
Same here, haven't weighed any in years.
 
I don't, because I view ML shooting as a fun activity that doesn't require slavish routines. I'm not a tournament shooter, so a 9 or an 8 rather than an X or a ten won't upset me. If you're really into shooting, do you avoid all caffeinated drinks and alcohol, get at least eight hours of sleep every night, dry fire daily for an hour or more, etc., etc.? If you do those things, that's great, but there's a life to enjoy as well and I don't think that a thin patch or a ball a few tenths lighter or heavier will make much of a difference. For me, at least, it doesn't.
 
Back
Top