Well, you guys shoot what you want, but I wish you would take your in-line discussions the the sister site.
I’m waiting for the bottom to fall out of the ladies swimsuit business..I've never been interested in purchasing a custom rifle/musket mostly because they don't pass my personal cost/value/enjoyment scale threshold. When I buy expensive arms they are generally historic or investments. However, I can appreciate true craftsmanship when I see it and I find no fault in what others do with their money based on their own personal value scale. But when I read through the various opinions on this forum and others about the future state of the hobby, I wonder whether the value of an expensive custom rifle/musket is holding up, or will hold up over time. I'm not referring to Gusler from scratch builds or the like, but to the custom longarms from builders that source and use basically the same high-quality locks and barrels that are available to all of them and sell those $3K/$4K/$5k+ flintlocks. Seems to me that type of custom build that is valued primarily on its craftsmanship will not have much of a future market to maintain that value. Especially, as more and more come to market.
For those who have an interest and buy or have sold those types of custom longarms, have you seen any impacts in the resale or purchase prices over the last few years? Are prices relatively stable and fewer of the best builders are actually doing business? Is it the complete opposite, with market, value, and, prices increasing? Or, are there other dynamics at play?
I suppose we will, just like you do, but I think you mentioned the unmentionable first and we are not really discussing the unmentionables here just the politics surrounding them. Mentioning an unmentionable is not really a discussion about unmentionables. Did I use the word "unmentionable" enough here? I fired my only unmentionable just over a year ago and have no real plans to shoot it again any time soon as I discovered that I really didn't like it all that much... too much trouble to clean, doesn't fit me very well and it came with a scope that I don't really like on the gun.Well, you guys shoot what you want, but I wish you would take your in-line discussions the the sister site.
One can only hope...I’m waiting for the bottom to fall out of the ladies swimsuit business..
I certainly hope things do cycle back. I used to help teach hunters ed and it was enlightening to see the attitudes of the next generation of hunters as the came through the classes. I've come to the conclusion that by making something easier, to draw more to the sport, sell more licenses and tags, whatever, a disproportionate number of less desirable individuals show up. I've seen this in archery as well as gun hunters. When I was working my job put me in the field, in contact with hundreds of hunters. Years of contacts led me to my opinion.I'm involved with a non-profit conservation group that has a lot of younger guys among it's members. In fact, I'm part of the old guy crew and I'm only in my 40s. Most of the young guys I've met aren't lazy. Far from it -- they're insanely dedicated & will do immense amounts of work for the same deer or elk that too many old guys get from the seat of a pickup truck. But, time is at a premium. For those that have an interest in muzzleloaders, the modern type rifle is as practical a choice as a compound bow. One is far more likely to make you meat with the least amount of work, fuss or knowledge so you can spend your time working on things like woodsmanship, locations, stalking skills, glassing skills, etc. If you have 1 opportunity a year to get your buck and usually less than that, what are you going to carry with you? When the time finally comes to make your shot, are you going to want more certainty or less? The industry created those modern unmentionable rifles because they are more reliable, require less knowledge and shoot more like CF rifles than traditional MLs. It's a purely practical choice. Those special seasons are designed to give special access to those who choose to limit themselves. But, the industry pushes hard to eliminate those limits as much as they can in hopes of greater sales. And they have largely succeeded. People are people. Business is business.
But what I see among traditional archers these days gives me hope about MLs too. Even my local archery shop owner, who I once overheard bragging about his 80-yard compound shot on a deer, has switched to traditional. He likes the $1k+ custom bows. I shoot the Chinese knock-offs. But plenty of others are making their own stickbows (done that myself as well). I hope something similar will happen with MLs too. Often, things go in cycles. It may cycle back again.
My comment was only to bring up a point that only traditional firearms should be used in a true muzzleloader season. When muzzleloading seasons first started, Thomson Center made big bucks selling finished rifles and kits. No guns were available with plastic stocks, scoped, and using unmentionable bullets surrounded in plastic.I suppose we will, just like you do, but I think you mentioned the unmentionable first and we are not really discussing the unmentionables here just the politics surrounding them. Mentioning an unmentionable is not really a discussion about unmentionables. Did I use the word "unmentionable" enough here? I fired my only unmentionable just over a year ago and have no real plans to shoot it again any time soon as I discovered that I really didn't like it all that much... too much trouble to clean, doesn't fit me very well and it came with a scope that I don't really like on the gun.
The problem with many Gun Snobs is they think their own little slice of the Second Amendment pie is the only slice that matters.If I choose to be a gun snob, that's my business!
It has absolutely nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. The original name for muzzleloading season was the "primitive" season. Much like, if there is a season for primitive bows, no one should not use compounds or recurves, only long bows. Nor should they use steel points, only knapped arrowheads. Oh, by the way, I go for the entire 2nd amendment, not little slices. Just wanted to make that absolutely clear.The problem with many Gun Snobs is they think their own little slice of the Second Amendment pie is the only slice that matters.
They're perfectly content with other guns being banned or marginalized.
Many of them are fine with grabbing and confiscation just as long as it's not their slice of the 2A pie that's being grabbed and confiscated.
What's that old saying?It has absolutely nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. The original name for muzzleloading season was the "primitive" season. Mch like, if there is a season for primitive bows, one should not use compounds or recurves. Nor should they use steel points, only knapped arrowheads.
I hunted in deer skin a few times.What's that old saying?
I remember. I'd see my sisters in a Tiajuana who re house before I gave up hunting with my compound bow during bow season.
There's history and period correctness and then there's taking history and period correctness a tad too far.
Should we all disrobe from our modern hunting cloths and run around the woods in deer skin loincloths during "Real" bow season?
I think the Kibler kits will hurt the high end gun builders. Why would anyone want to contract a builder to build you a custom gun for $1500 ( and up ) and wait a year or so to get it when you can order a Kibler kit for $1200. and build it yourself.
You have to wait 2-3 weeks to get your kit that can build in a weekend or two with minimal tools required. You'll have a rifle that is well build by yourself with top notch parts you can pass down to your children.
It doesn't get much better than that.
The Kibler kits are not custom rifles though. The lines and architecture of them, though appealing, are the same, and if one of them is in a rack it is instantly recognizable as being a Kibler gun, even with embellishments.I think the Kibler kits will hurt the high end gun builders. Why would anyone want to contract a builder to build you a custom gun for $1500 ( and up ) and wait a year or so to get it when you can order a Kibler kit for $1200. and build it yourself.
You have to wait 2-3 weeks to get your kit that can build in a weekend or two with minimal tools required. You'll have a rifle that is well build by yourself with top notch parts you can pass down to your children.
It doesn't get much better than that.
Idaho has a good law. I wish Arkansas was anti-inline. Pennsylvania has the best law, flintlock only season!@NorthFork While I don't agree with all you had to say, I do agree with yoru time line of 20 years. Our supplies are tight and it is increasingly more difficult to get them, Who would think that in Boise, ID you would have to order out of state from Grafs to get BP. Caps.....same. And our State doesn't allow in-lines for muzzleloader hunting.
Yes, indeed we are members of a dying sport.
Enter your email address to join: