Brokennock
Cannon
Excellent. That's what it is supposed to be aboutI learned something here today!
Excellent. That's what it is supposed to be aboutI learned something here today!
The kid (19 year old) they excavated on Jamestown Island was shot in the knee with a load that contained a caliver ball (@ 20 ga) and six pieces of shot. He didn’t “die horribly of infection,” however. Where he got hit, his femoral artery would have been severed. He was certainly dead within minutes.At either Jamestown or Roanoke, archeologists uncovered a grave of a young man that was unfortunate enough to have been shot in the knee/or leg and died horribly from infection. They were able to identify and remove a ball and cut shot made from chisel or knife quartered round balls. You maybe able to find the video on youtube. Nasty stuff no matter whether it is modern round cast shot or cut up material.
The wound showed evidence of infection that could not have existed if he bled to death. Of course I am relating what was said by the forensic pathologist and not first hand experience. Were you the forensic pathologist that examined the remains? Or were you going by second hand information? The point is that the wound was caused by a ball as well as "shot" though i guess you would dispute cast or cut as well.The kid (19 year old) they excavated on Jamestown Island was shot in the knee with a load that contained a caliver ball (@ 20 ga) and six pieces of shot. He didn’t “die horribly of infection,” however. Where he got hit, his femoral artery would have been severed. He was certainly dead within minutes.
Jay
No, I’m just going by what I’ve picked up from talking to the archaeologists and forensic anthropologists who dug him up and have curated the remains during the 20 years I’ve spent working at Jamestown.The wound showed evidence of infection that could not have existed if he bled to death. Of course I am relating what was said by the forensic pathologist and not first hand experience. Were you the forensic pathologist that examined the remains? Or were you going by second hand information? The point is that the wound was caused by a ball as well as "shot" though i guess you would dispute cast or cut as well.
If that is true then you would note that the one pathologist (kelso I believe but I am sure you will correct me right or wrong) that brought up the theory that death was quick said it COULD have severed the artery not did. You seem have left that word out. Interesting you seem not to have discussed the remains with the pathologist who thought there was evidence of infectious damage to the bone. Enjoy your superiority. By the way 19 in Jamestown is considered a kid?No, I’m just going by what I’ve picked up from talking to the archaeologists and forensic anthropologists who dug him up and have curated the remains during the 20 years I’ve spent working at Jamestown.
Jay
You are quite correct. I appologize for my part and responding to the manner in which the opposing view was presented.Another interesting thread turned into an on-going argument and accusations. It’s almost to be expected any more.
Enter your email address to join: