Here is an image of a spring retaining plate, showing how the trigger is offset:
Here are some examples of why the little ball on the stock was necessary:Sir;
Any idea what is the purpose of the ball on the butstock?
Thank you,
Hector
good, thanks! Just saw a bunch of tanksCool! How's your trip?
looking into this again, I’m honestly not sure if French pistols were sporting or military arms. They all seem to come as a classic military pair of pistols and vaguely resemble the shape of the other military wheellock pistols in the later part of the 30 years war. I’m skeptical of their overall durability for combat though, due to their more delicate construction and slim shape. They are frequently highly decorated (could also be due to survivorship bias), but so are puffers, which absolutely were military arms and even intended to work as an emergency club. Does anyone have any ideas or evidence for one way or the other?while most other French wheellocks are sporting arms.
I looked at the online collection page for the massive wheellock, and there is all sorts of funkiness going on. It uses a Turkish barrel, which is particularly strange. I am aware of the practice for Austrian sporting guns after the second ottoman siege of Vienna, but not on a 16th or early 17th century French arm.View attachment 324400
The V&A has an unusual massive French wheellock musket, with an archetypically dainty and slim French carbine below it.
That could be possible, but one claim I’ve seen about Germanic wheellock pistols losing decoration in the 1600s is due to a supply and demand issue, where it was too time consuming and impractical to supply decorated pistols for the massive army expansion and attrition before and during the 30 years war. Cuirassiers/Reiters were perfectly happy taking art museum worthy pistols into combat during the 1500s. I’m not sure if it would be different for the French, particularly because the previously mentioned cavalry were extensively used in the French wars of religions. The French might have also not preserved their plain pistols, once they were replaced by flintlocks.I think a lot of the highly decorated arms were just badges of rank, and one upsmanship among the ruling class. If they ventured into combat, they may have had plainer “ working “ weapons.
Or their workshop got burned down, like in Suhl. I’m certainly happy I live here and now!Maybe all the lower workers who decorated the stocks and chiseled the barrels got drafted? The masters were secure in their positions, but the ordinary employees may have been forced to fight… or farm work.
Me thinks you may have that backwards, from what I have read the chiselers were indeed the master engravers. Sal Alfano, a living master engraver has a chiseling course, but he encourages people to learn how to engrave - using the hammer and hand gravers, not pneumatic machines - first.Maybe all the lower workers who decorated the stocks and chiseled the barrels got drafted? The masters were secure in their positions .
Our Sam has certainly got some clues .Which I mean in a complimentary way. As for loot after Waterloo I think all the Cabinet d arms guns had inventory numbers so the V&A gun likely had these As for mixes of parts & cultures even the Vikings traded into the Ottoman Empire .' Business is business'after all.I think a lot of the highly decorated arms were just badges of rank, and one upsmanship among the ruling class. If they ventured into combat, they may have had plainer “ working “ weapons.
Enter your email address to join: