Call me "racial" if you want,.... but,.... I have always considered "MODERN INLINES" to be nuthin but MODIFIED CENTERFIRES!! /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/cool.gif ::
Amen to that. I got some flack when I posted on another forum that I had beat CVA, T/C and others to the punch by 25 years when I competed in a match with a .303 SMLE, loaded from the front on top of a primed cartridge. Also, like today's inlines, got a lot of keyholes.
The original point of ML season's was to enable primitive shooters (who, like archers, handicap themselves) a chance to hunt without needing to look over their shoulders for a mob of city slickers blasting away at noises, motion and silhouettes of deer on the distant horizon. I hunted once with a left handed guy carrying a right handed Mossberg bolt action 12 ga who managed to blow off a box (25 in those days) and a half of shells before the first hour of season had passed.
It would be wise of conservation depts. to require new licensees get at least one deer with a ML before allowing them to carry a CF rifle (or inline) which will carry considerably longer distance than a RB. Maybe some of these hunting accidents would be prevented if these idiots had to learn about taking the time to place their shot carefully instead of knowing they had a gas cylinder standing by with 4 more rounds in the mag to send up the south end of a bounding target. Maybe in that time they'd have some time to think about what is behind their target.
Inlines were designed to get around the conservation laws and sell guns to the smokeless market. Hunting laws specifying "primitive" rather than "black powder" would be approriate. Three cheers for Musketman for carrying a Brown Bess when everyone else is carrying a 30/30 and boooo to anyone who didn't like it.
Rolling blocks in the flintlock era? No, not in that era, but there was probably a mountain man or two left carrying a flintlock Hawken.