brushbuster
40 Cal.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2004
- Messages
- 471
- Reaction score
- 0
i do have a couple of center fire rifles with synthetic stocks,but i have not,nor will ever own a traditional rifle with a synthetic stock,to me they just dont fit(thet "a"word). i love firearms period,and shoot them all,although my other guns have been feelin neglected lately.Not trying to pick a fight, :nono: but I just wanted to see how people here feel about "traditional style" rifles, percussion or flintlock, with synthetic stocks? Personally I use one now, because its lighter and if it gets a scratch, I won't feel obligated to strip the finish and redo it. But I won't stoop to using a modern inline. :curse: :shake:
Just :m2c:
I agree with Claude, it's your rifle...
every person i know that has an inline ,wants a traditional rifle in the future.if that is where they get their interest in b/p rifles and progress to traditional ,so be it.
do inlines fit in a traditional living history event or voo?
not only no but h...no!!! :nono:they are designed to replecate(paint a picture,if you will) how our ancesters lived in the past ,not present.
that being said. and as the evp in the feb issue of muzzle blast said ."we need to stick together" and promote our wonderful sport to those who want to learn,and quit bickering amongst ourselves.
i have my opinions the same as every one else,but i refuse to let my opinions cloud the big picture.
which is defending our right to "keep and bare arms".
nuff said,i,ll get off my soap box now :imo: :m2c: :yakyak: :redthumb: