- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 3,659
- Reaction score
- 2,692
Which 3rd model? There were 2 patterns.
I wouldn’t do a third model , not huge demand in USA
Which 3rd model? There were 2 patterns.
A Bess has unique architecture. A Bess in anything other than walnut (and *maybe* beech) will look like a Bess in the wrong wood. Colonial guns may have resembled them, but were not copies by any stretch.I agree, if Jim Kibler offer’s a brown Bess in Cherry, well then you can call it a colonial restocked brown Bess, or call it a colonial gun if you must. My point was the choice different wood is a neat option.
A situation that is almost as silly as the love of the Bess in general while completely ignoring the French muskets. Or the odd love affair with the Baker rifle.I wouldn’t do a third model , not huge demand in USA
Virginia certainly had some that came very close.A Bess has unique architecture. A Bess in anything other than walnut (and *maybe* beech) will look like a Bess in the wrong wood. Colonial guns may have resembled them, but were not copies by any stretch.
Of course, one could always modify a Bess stock to make it more generic.
Virginia certainly had some that came very close.
And English Gentlemans Flintlock Sporting Rifle.Trade Guns too, tulle and northwest.
Regarding Mr. Kibler's post I believe there would be a viable market for a historically accurate Brown Bess kit.
Another option could be an "Officers Model" fusil similar to the last one brought to market by Curly Gostomski.
Here in French dominated Missouri and Illinois it is hard to find British reenactors.
I agree with you 100%. The other guy is some type of "know it all" jerk. Like you, I also have studied history. During the French & Indian War the British government did supply the colonist with Brown Bess muskets. Some of Rogers' Rangers used a cut down Brown Bess, creating a carbine. I personally have a replica of one of those. The Continental Congress borrowed money from France to buy and equip our forces with Charleville muskets too.Obviously my “tongue in cheek” comment went completely over your irrational, judge-mental head. The founding fathers were willing to face death to rebel against their perceived “oppression”. One man’s patriot is another’s enemy. Living at the time when all these things unfolded gives that person a certain perspective on the choice to become a loyalist or a rebel.
Enforcing the peace or guilty of the Boston massacre depends on an individual's viewpoint.
Many thanks for instructing me about all those French muskets that apparently were not supplied to the Continental Army.
Incidentally, Mr. Knowledge, I have not read a comic book since I was seven. My interest in history started shortly after and expanded from the Civil War back into medieval Europe.
The post was meant to try to understand why so many are interested in the King’s musket when they were considered government property and not actually available to the private citizen. Thanks to @dave_person for his informative response. As for you, go find your own mydol bottle.
At the end of the F&I war, the Crown had sent approximately 30,000 Kings pattern muskets with wood rammers (1730, 1730/40, 1742 patterns) and 4,500 Dutch muskets. 2,000 P1757 Marine & Militia muskets were also sent, there were also full commercial copies of the Kings musket that were imported. How many survived to be placed into armories of the various colonies and the royal storehouse in NY I have never been able to find out. There were in all probability some private citizens that kept their muskets, but that is something that would be hard to pin down.Now I learned something today! Any idea of approximate numbers of the Long Land Pattern in the colonies at the outset of the war? Were these mostly housed in militia armories? Did private citizens have these as well?
Thanks for the information.
Snoot
Dave, how universal are contracted infantry muskets such as a Wilson contract musket? I don’t know much about the other regimental contracted muskets. Universal meaning covering all time periods from the French and Indian and Rev War.
Hi,A Bess has unique architecture. A Bess in anything other than walnut (and *maybe* beech) will look like a Bess in the wrong wood. Colonial guns may have resembled them, but were not copies by any stretch.
Of course, one could always modify a Bess stock to make it more generic.
Hi Nick,Dave, how universal are contracted infantry muskets such as a Wilson contract musket? I don’t know much about the other regimental contracted muskets. Universal meaning covering all time periods from the French and Indian and Rev War.
To the uneducated myself included, that IS a Brown bess. Only lacking the Tower engraving.Hi Nick,
Sorry, I did not respond to your question earlier. I am not sure how common the commercial muskets would have been in the early Rev War. Certainly many were purchased during from about 1747 to the early 1760s by Virginia, South Carolina, New Jersey, New York, and Connecticut but by the AWI, those guns would be pretty old. If held privately, they might have been cared for and still in good condition in 1775 but I suspect any stored in colonial arsenals were probably in bad shape. In the 18th century, in which environmental controls within buildings was primitive at best, stored muskets were perishable commodities. You can imagine what kind of staff you would need to clean and maintain 500 muskets and prevent them from rusting away. Anyway, I know there are a number of surviving colonially made muskets using parts from old commercial muskets and I am sure some survived and were used. Don Troiani painted a circa 1776 3rd NJ regiment soldier carrying one. I don't know how common they were, however. Most New Jersey guns purchased during the 1750s are at the bottom of Lake George off Sabbath Day Point. I made an early Rev War NJ militia musket that used old commercial muskets parts.
dave
Enter your email address to join: