Ike Godsey said:
Artificer said:
Ike,
The Pedersoli and Japanese Besses have been allowed here in FIW reeanacting for quite some time .....
OK, that does also mean one could wear tennis shoes for FWI reenacting. :rotf:
:rotf: Good jest, but........ you do realize there were 18th century shoes made for the affluent to play an older form of Tennis (and was actually called Tennis going back a century or more before that) than the game we play today? :wink:
The ONLY reason I know that is because the Cordwainer at Colonial Williamsburg in the early 1980's, displayed some reproduction 18th century English Tennis Shoes that he had made along with reproductions of other English shoes and boots. So, yes, there really WERE FIW period HC/PC Tennis Shoes, though certainly not like the "Modern Tennis Shoes" sold today. :wink:
FIW reenacting here in America goes back to the 1970's/early 1980's when I began doing AWI in 1974. Since the Pedersoli was the ONLY reproduction Brown Bess for quite some time, it has been allowed for FIW reenacting for around 30 years before the Indian Muskets were available. Though it is NOT correct for FIW as sold, it will probably be allowed here for quite some time because so many have been allowed to be used here in FIW reenacting for four decades now.
It is just because Pedersoli and other possible gun makers refused to make a LLP musket, that demand began growing for one since 1980's and that Indian guns came to be made to fill that desire and be sold here.
Ike, I get a kick out of those who use the description "Miroku" Brown Bess instead of "a Bess made in Japan" or much more commonly "a JAP Bess" (as they were known for years) and then complain when India made guns are not openly advertised IN EACH description of each gun, but when the company is asked, they readily tell you the gun is made in India. It is a fact THAT Dixie DID NOT OPENLY MENTION those guns were made IN JAPAN for quite a few years when they began selling JAP Bess's. :stir: :grin:
Now to be FAIR, Miroku was already in modern gun production, so while rumours flew around THEM for the first few years, that actually ensured they had a good sound barrel. But there were many people back them calling them every derogatory thing in the books for their first years as well. However, the JAP BESS'S were purchased by many reenactors, because they were less expensive and even though many of their early versions did not work as well as the Pedersoli's. (GEE - One of the same reasons many people buy India made guns today.) Most of the problems were from the fact that just because someone can make a serviceable modern gun, it did not/does not mean they will make a good Flintlock until they get more feedback from the people who know flintlocks and the manufacturers understand how to build a better copy. The later JAP Bess's were better, but a lot cruder in many ways than the Pedersoli and less certain to far less certain of the JAP Bess working correctly when you got a new one VS the Pedersoli.
I have not worked on a huge number of JAP Bess's, but well over three or four dozen for different folks over the years. Even if one gets one of the "Old/Bad Ones," they can be fixed to make a good sound musket, though. Some time I will relate the story of the JAP Bess that had driven two Armourers before me nuts and frustrated me greatly before I figured out what the LAST problem was in that musket.
Gus