Gentlemen: My Post is to inform those who may not be aware of the existance of MuzzleBlasts magazine that it exists.
In my opinion, it is worth the money it costs to subscribe to it.
Has it improved in recent years and published more of the articles that I want to see? IMO, some issues are better than others. Some old issues don't have much that interests me. The same can be said for some new issues, but all issues have something I want to read.
Does it have too much information about the organization in it? Perhaps, but it is after all, the official monthly report on the NMLRA.
Do I like every article? No, but the same can be said for MuzzleLoader magazine and the other magazines I subscribe to.
Do I care if the NMLRA permits someone to shoot BPCRs on their range? No. (I have yet to see an article about BPCRs appear in this magazine.)
Do I care if the NMLRA includes modern muzzleloaders trophys in the Hunting Section? Yes and No. I think they should have a seperate class and section for them, but they are muzzleloaders. I never read that area anyway.
Isn't MuzzleLoader better? That depends on the issue. Sometimes they have a lot of what interests me, sometimes not much that interests me.
Both magazines are very good.
From a cost standpoint, MuzzleBlasts costs $40/12 or $3.33 per issue. MuzzleLoader costs $22/6 or $3.67 each.
As I implyed when I started this post, some folks have an intense hatred for the NMLRA for one reason or another. That is thier choice, not mine. I do feel they are missing some interesting information but if they are happy with themselves who am I to say they are wrong?
By the way, anyone in the Phoenix area, don't forget:
The
Western National Shoot will be held February 22-27 at Ben Avery Shooting Range 25 miles North of Phoenix. Folks from all over the Nation compete at this event and they always have Real Black Powder for sale.
![Smile :) :)]()