I AGREE 100 PERCENT!!!!One solution would be to open the NCIS data base up to everyone, not just FFL's. The information is from public records, anyway. We opened the records on sex offenders, why not thieves, people adjudged dangerous to themselves or others? Then again. some have "skeletons", I suppose.
they got just what they wanted.They also jacked up the cost of renewal's mine went from $33 to $300 so I sent it back to them with my bound book as required. Then they started hassling me for about a year wanting to know the name and address of my employee or partner. I finally convinced them I never had an employee or partner.
and a lot of guys here support itSocialists \Communists \ Leftists \liberals akaemoncrats destroying our freedoms and America
The atf needs to focus on violent gang members and cartel drug dealers instead of people doing a rare occasional sale. If you are selling 50 guns a month without an FFL , yes, that’s not good, but no reason to raid someone at the cops
cops scared of them cause they will fight back rather issue tickets to soccer moms. in the cities cop higher ups getting paid off from the narcosThe atf needs to focus on violent gang members and cartel drug dealers instead of people doing a rare occasional sale. If you are selling 50 guns a month without an FFL , yes, that’s not good, but no reason to raid someone at 5am.
This is such an obvious and easy solution it's beyond belief that it would ever be adopted.One solution would be to open the NCIS data base up to everyone, not just FFL's. .....
Yeah, because it's not about crime and criminals. It's all about restricting gun rights.This is such an obvious and easy solution it's beyond belief that it would ever be adopted.
The girls I work with do research on guys they may want to date using online record searches. Mostly for domestic violence and drug convictions. Privacy is a thing of the past.One solution would be to open the NCIS data base up to everyone, not just FFL's. The information is from public records, anyway. We opened the records on sex offenders, why not thieves, people adjudged dangerous to themselves or others? Then again. some have "skeletons", I suppose.
The greater the technology the lesser freedom.The girls I work with do research on guys they may want to date using online record searches. Mostly for domestic violence and drug convictions. Privacy is a thing of the past.
I'm not busting on anyone, If someone chooses to do something and it's not hurting anybody else let it eat.And getting a CCW card opens doors to. I know people who never will pack heat, they just got the training and card to show they are not a felon.
FTF selling of guns.I'm not busting on anyone, If someone chooses to do something and it's not hurting anybody else let it eat.
I think that's kinda funny that they feel they would have to do such a thing.
Just me.
It's such that it's written where if they feel the need they could argue intent and lock most anyone up that has ever sold a gun.I believe they have to prove that you are selling to earn a profit on a large scale, I don’t think an occasional sale is prohibited- but they are working on it!
men should do a search on the girls maybe find out they are on only fansThe girls I work with do research on guys they may want to date using online record searches. Mostly for domestic violence and drug convictions. Privacy is a thing of the past.
When you say "govt" I think you mean the Executive Branch. It's clear the Supreme Court has respect and regard for the Second Amendment. I think maybe at least half of the Legislative Branch does as well. But what's also clear is that the Executive Branch, as currently occupied in both its Executive and its Cabinet-level Departments has no respect and regard for the Supreme Court or the Legislative Branch. The Executive Branch, even since long before the current occupant of the head of that branch, has sought to unbalance the Consititutional balance of powers in its favor. Leading us to today with an entrenched without limits establishment bureacracy under that branch that is exercising powers allowed to them by that branch that go well beyond laws passed by the Legislative Branch and ruled as Constitutional by the Judicial Branch. The "govt" is not the problem. The problem is how it came to be so unbalanced. The problem is also what can be done to rebalance it again. If the "separation of powers" designed into our government isn't working any more, and if one branch doesn't respect and abide by the powers alloted to another branch, we can't rely on the government itself to "fix" itself, because it's simply no longer working in the way it was originally designed to work. The real problem is that the "govt" is broken.judging by a lot of comments here it is plain to see why the govt has no fear of the 2nd amendment ....
Enter your email address to join: